• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 10th, 2026

help-circle






  • What I’m about to state is not a personal attack. We can discuss this without hatred even if we end the discussion by agreeing to disagree.

    Biden had 4 years to prevent Trumps 2nd term. Biden had arguably the best intel in the world in the world working for him. He had an abundance of resources. One self sabotage (if you want to call it that) was Democrats choosing to have Kamala run against Trump last minute. Even if it wasn’t last minute, Kamala is a minority and a woman which is a major disadvantage. Not to make this a race discussion but a white woman couldn’t even beat Trump. I’m not trying to make this about race but we can’t ignore that.

    Democrats didn’t mess up. They were complicit.

    Democrats and the Biden Admin giving the 2024 election the old-college-try to stop Trump getting reelected wasn’t a fumble. They threw the game on purpose. They were fully aware of what was at stake and the climate they were in. Democrats aren’t making mistakes. They are letting changes happen and then acting appalled. A sweep in the midterms will only slow down the train but they won’t stop it. They can’t stop it. The system is broken and has giren significantly more broken in recent years.






  • I can explain my point to you but I cant make you understand it. We aren’t going to see things eye to eye here. I agree with a lot of what you said I still don’t feel like I’ve been fully understood but that doesn’t matter. Your overall point is something I agree with.


  • I guess I should have worded my last sentence better because I don’t actually care about the answer to that meme. That sentence was such a small part of my comment I almost didn’t include it before I posted it. It’s purpose was to show an example of how difficult it can be to research things that should be easy to find answers to.

    I didn’t ask you to provide a bibliography. I’m not your school professor and I wouldn’t trust your bibliography even if you were capable of stringing a bibliography together without having a website/AI do it for you.

    If you understood the context of my entire previous comment instead of just sharp shooting the last sentence, you would already understand where my distrust comes from.


  • I think part of the issue is finding credible sources. Who is to say what is credible and what is not credible anymore. The problem is deeper than people being lazy. Two people can research the same thing using sources they believe to be credible and get completely different answers.

    Do we go off peer reviewed journals for credibility? Now you can be lazy just based off that. Who funded it, how big was the sample size, were there things in the study that could skew the results such as a lack of control group?

    Google, AI social media all have their own agendas they use to skew public opinion. Are books at the library credible? Yeah? How are you so sure. Who published them, what political donations and biased have they had?

    The president says things aren’t credible while at the same time saying you can’t trust the government. Everything contradicts itself if you look enough. So then do we go through a bunch of conflicting data while trying to maintain an unbiased opinion and then at the end decide what is real and what isn’t? Are you supposed to trust news agencies in other countries? Now you have to research about those companies to see their history. Have they gotten new leadership anytime soon? All I wanted to know is if the United States is funding a war against itself by buying oil from Russia and it’s turned into a rabbit hole with little definitive answers.