Aww that’s gotta be the cutest Nancy comic I’ve seen

That one took me a second, but it’s a good one

Gotta be the most Murican thing I heard today

I’m the complete opposite omg I love humans so much

Pretty decent in Switzerland. The cost of living has always been very high here, but so have the wages and inflation hasn’t been as bad here as in other places over the past few years.

Edit: Also, the fuel prices don’t really affect me at all, or at least only very indirectly. Now, more than ever, I am grateful for the awesome trains we have.

Ooh, for 10-20 million dollars I might be able to eat out once!

The open world is ridiculously detailed as well. There’s so much stuff and so much thought was put into every corner if it.

What a cute flufftrap you have

Put two birds in one basket?

A German one:

Im Glashaus soll man nicht einen geschenkten Gaul werfen

Wow, thank fuck I decided against going to the military

About 100 years ago, the situation was similar to how it is today. The rich were rich and only getting richer and the workers were being exploited mercilessly. The people were fed up and so there was an unprecedented general strike. This caused Parliament to introduce a max 48h work week, social security for old people among many other things. This was followed by a period of general prosperity for working people.

Now the pendulum is swinging the other way again, the way of the rich and powerful, but it will swing back in our favour in due time, further than it ever has. As long as we are living in a democracy, the government is ultimately beholden to the people and at some point the people will get fed up and the times will change again. Be a part of that!

Yes, we do, and I think it’s a shame that we do those instead of wheels

Why don’t we humans use these kinds of wheels? That seems like fun.

ALL OF THE CHEESE

SO MUCH FUCKING CHEESE

SO MUCH FUCKING CHEESE

I agree with you here (and also cool project/idea). What I’m trying to get at with my analogy is that, if you understand a programme’s source code, you understand and are able to predict its behaviour in a meaningful way (although of course you lose some amount of knowledge of what the processor exactly does with which registers etc). When you only know the prompt used to generate a programme, you can’t do that. That’s why you have to manually check the code an LLM writes, but not the assembly generated by a compiler.

I think he’s kinda right in that competent engineers can write good code using LLMs. I don’t know whether they’re actually more productive that way though. The problem lies in the fact that incompetent engineers can write a lot of bad, but good-looking code using LLMs, which might be a pretty big burden on the maintainers.

Also, comparing LLMs to compilers doesn’t really work in my opinion. Compilers follow strict rules and translate one kind of logic into a different kind of logic, while LLMs turn natural language and vague notions into some kind of logic. Writing code is telling the computer precisely what it should do and prompting is vaguely telling it what end result you want and those are two fundamentally different things.

So that people with an M on their passport can do obligatory military service

(Yes, I am salty about this, how’d you know?)

((Also I think that’s the only remaining way in which people with an M or an F are treated differently where I live so at least we’re making some progress I guess))

(((Oh also they need it to more effectively grope trans people at airport security)))