They’re not

You could count the number of hands on one hand.

https://repebble.com/ maybe? Or https://pine64.org/devices/pinetime/ ?

Personally I have a Fitbit, and it works on GrapheneOS, though I’m not sure if it would still work without Play services.

Really? I don’t think the BMW i series look any different from their other vehicles.

But all of them with the giant bucktooth pedipalp grilles instead of the Poirot mustache grilles look stupid.

It looks almost exactly like the 2006-2018 Dodge Chargers.

It’s not different. You’re not going to stop college kids from partying. They’ll just go to an unaffiliated house and continue.

I know Cornell wants to be seen as doing something, but this is actually counterproductive. It pushes the parties underground, where there’s less safety and oversight.

Campus police are actual police. They handle all crimes in their jurisdiction. Yes, you could argue there’s a conflict of interest.

Generally, the state police aren’t involved in singular, local crimes. That’s why giving them a role is new.

They hardly ever actually pay these fines. They’ll make one or two payments, then stop, and nothing happens.

Yes.

Anubis provides a non-cutesy version. The only one dying on a hill here is you guys refusing to consider it.

Excellently corporate, I can already hear the MBAs salivating over how blandly cookie-cutter it is.

Then what’s the point of this post?

Cornell, like a lot of major universities, does have their own full police department, with the same powers as the city police. So there’s no difference between themselves and the cops.

Whether there’s a conflict of interest because they are university police is a separate question, and I would say yes.

More recently, Gears of War. Not revolutionary, but still popular.

I’ve used it. Works great. If you overload it with particle effects, screen-space effects, and high-poly models, yeah it’s going to run like shit, but that’s not the fault of the engine.

Wouldn’t that mean the compiled game is also not copyrightable?

In May, Zelnick told Bloomberg that Rockstar "always starts on console because I think with regard to a release like that you’re judged by serving the core. Like really serving the core consumer. If your core consumer isn’t there, if they’re not served first and best, you kind of don’t hit your other consumers.”

Can someone translate that into English for me, because I can’t understand it. It sounds like he’s saying PC players aren’t served if console players aren’t served first, which doesn’t make sense.

Then use it? You don’t have to give it your contacts.

First amendment guarantees freedom of association.

Speaking to even a brick wall would be better.