That’s a pretty bold assumption, how did you get there?
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
grranibal@lemmy.zipto
Europe@feddit.org•UK and EU agree to hold Brexit ‘reset’ summit on Nov. 20English
71·2 days agoWill the Excalibur limited-time event happen again?
grranibal@lemmy.zipto
science@lemmy.world•Preventive Tuberculosis Treatment Wanes After One Year in High-Burden Countries, but Lasts for at Least 8 to 13 Years in Low- and Medium-Burden CountriesEnglish
51·2 days agoWhat’s a high burden country?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias
Basically the story goes that planes would fly to the battle field and come back with bullet holes. Experts started charting where the bullet holes (as you can see in the top image) and decided to reinforce the armor in those areas since they were “the most commonly struck by bullets”. Makes sense!!! Exceptttttt… those were the planes that survived, meaning that the bullet we see in the image do not explain why planes fall in battle. Places that have no bullet holes in the image are the areas that, when struck by a bullet, would cause the plane to fall. When they started reinforcing the areas that have no bullets in the image, “plane survival” increased significantly.
I hope my explanation is understandable!
We need more hydro homies on this planet (disclaimer: AI is not a hydro homie)
grranibal@lemmy.zipto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•SBA #270 Time for a Commercial Break! SpongeBob Adventures is brought to you by...
5·6 days agoMathematicians sometimes be crazy
Thank you for the context, it’s really funny
grranibal@lemmy.zipto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Why do people discuss movie or comic books logic?
2·7 days agoYeah it’s just fun, like discussing who would win between universes e.g. bane vs. juggernaut

Song about pizza pies :D