I love conditional allyship cunts like you.

Pffft, as if I have money.

Fuck you.

I was being a little tongue-in-cheek.

I just don’t super agree with your premise that the “real” work of man is to do more, is all. I like to think it’s more to accomplish something with intention, craft, and rigor. We’ve disconnected ourselves from our “real” work.

Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?

Nothing about this situation is funny.

No one reads. Interesting.

A post modernist would never argue for neutral styles for efficiency…

Rectangles were fucking hard for a very long time. Which is why vernacular building strategies came about (why there’s so much variation in architecture older than the Industrial Revolution).

This entire thread reads like it’s filled with opinions from people who have never put anything together.

Holy shit this is a bad take.

It’s the structure that’s important and a fair argument could be made to say that the structure of a brain is replicated in software in an AI and therefore the medium isn’t relevant to the question.

We don’t even know this.

Then kill yourself.

Otherwise you’re just spewing inane babble.

Take that ‘libertarian’ and kill it.

Internal consistency is apparently very difficult for you.

I’m sorry you suck as a person.

You’re allowed, not justified.

Knowing the difference seems to nearly ungraspable to a lot of folks.

Where are you drawing the conclusion that either of these people are secure\insecure?

It seems like a lot of mental gymnastics on your part trying to compensate for your mental and social shortcuts.

Also, check yourselves before you start thinking any internally facing criticism is a marker of the opposition. That’s fucking groupthink.

So altering your appearance is only acceptable if you didn’t “sell your soul” otherwise it’s another valid point of criticism, is that it?

I’m sure this self-felating comment is really the kick we need to get us there!