• YeahToast@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    How do you see the longevity of it. You obviously learnt how to code before ai. What about those learning now that are learning only having access to ai. Id anticipate the quality over time will deteriorate

    • Havatra@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think we’ll unfortunately see a degradation over time of capable programmers, as it’s with most other things: Humans learn poorly from seeing things being done for them, rather than doing it themselves. AI can be a good resource for iteration and a sort of rubber duck, and even for explaining things (with external confirmation). But as it currently stands, people find it much more attractive to just let AI do the work for them. That’s the most prominent work culture after all, based on capitalistic values: Economic growth above all.

      I see it in schools as well, unfortunately: Students find it much more appealing to get good grades than to actually learn. Not everyone, of course, but still way too many.

      And I do understand many of the students: The bar for junior programmers has now increased, as a lot of employers simply think “why hire a human that is on the same level as AI?”.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        Students find it much more appealing to get good grades than to actually learn.

        Because there is a direct impact on your chances for a better life. Having better grades give you access to better schools (and in the US, scholarships as well).

        The emphasis of our school system is results.