• NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Lower population is generally better for almost all sectors.

    But lowering the population means killing people or restricting birthing rights.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well no. That’s a wildly incorrect take.

      Birth rates are already decreasing and are below replacement rate in many places already. Fertility rates are at an all time low. They naturally decrease as income and quality of life increases.

      The global fertility rate is 2.2 births per woman. Which is just barely above replacement. In most developed nations, that rate is down in the 1.6 range, well below replacement.

      Total Human population is excepted to peak within 50 years and then begun naturally declining, but many countries are already there. China has seen several consecutive years of population decline. India is seeing a leveling off of population growth and will soon decline. The US is increasing solely off of immigration. Japan has a decreasing population. Same with Korea. 8 EU countries have seen population declines over the last 20 years.

      If you wanted to see population decline in the US specifically, banning immigration would do it and we’d see a decline in the next census.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      People can also just stop breeding. Seems to be happening in a lot of developed countries. Might be slower but I bet the population will level off eventually. Or plummet dramatically from climate change/right wing political policies.