Up to you whether you want to limit your answer to software that is possible/realistic

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s a great idea in theory, but the reality is that LLMs just aren’t actually very good at that kind of thing.

    Depending on the temperature of the model their writing is either painfully bland and repetitive, or it’s the kind of “creative” that’s driven by randomness, so you’ll get completely out of pocket replies that just don’t fit the situation at all.

    The answer to what this person is looking for is simple; find a good group to play tabletop RPGs with. Software is never going to give you that experience.

    • bizarroland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think it depends on the harness.

      Like the LLMs are not good at keeping narrative structure intact, but with a harness that could create a playbook of known information for each AI character that the current LLM that you are interacting with can reference, then it could contribute to emergent gameplay and help build a relatively vibrant world.

      The real downside is that it would require an entire data center as a bare minimum to run all of the LLMs, like the technology is still too raw and new for it to make financial sense unless people were willing to pay $500 or $600 a month to play this game.