TLDR: Which distro is better for gaming and video editing (NVIDIA GPU), CachyOS or Ubuntu?

Hi! It’s been probably a month since I started using Linux (escaping from Windows), and I choose LMDE since the distro that I felt aligned more with what I want from a distro on in general is Debian, but since it was my first time using Linux on my main device (just tried Debian on a laptop to run a Homelab) I got recommended Mint to make it easier for me to adapt. The thing is that since I started using LMDE I’ve discovered that it doesn’t cover perfectly my needs. Two things that I didn’t want to lose when switching to Linux were gaming and the ability to run video/audio/photo editing programs flawlessly, mainly DaVinci Resolve and AffinityPhoto. It’s been practically impossible to achieve that, since DaVinci doesn’t work, can’t even get to install AffinityPhoto and some videogames need more recent (NVIDIA) drivers than what Debian and of course LMDE can offer. So, seeing that I want to keep LMDE (and maybe in the future upgrade from LMDE to Debian) but at the same time I’m not willing to give up on those 2 things, I believe the dual-boot option is the one that suits me the most. Now, what I’m here for. I’ve been doing some research and the ones that caught my atention the most were CachyOS and Ubuntu:

  • CachyOS: PROS: · High gaming performance and (looks like) compatibility. · Looks like DaVinci works perfectly for a lot of people (although some other people claim having issues). CONS: · Sounds too complex as a distro for someone who has close to zero programming knowledge and just started using Linux. · The rolling release aspect feels a little scary too.

  • Ubuntu: PROS: · May not be THE gaming distro but it seems to be working for a lot of people without having extensive programming or Linux knowledge. · Generally may be more compatible and stable than CachyOS in general · Seems it will be easier for me to adapt to since it’s Debian-based. CONS: · Doesn’t seem as good as CachyOS on a performance standpoint, affecting both video editing and gaming capabilities.

Now, my questions would be: Am I mistaken in any of the info I have revolving these two distros? Could I be missing any other options? Which do you think is the distro that could suit me the most? Any recommendation when doing the Dual-boot? I have never done it and it scares me a little tbh.

My main priority is having a stable (and compatible in the first place, of course) experience (maybe Ubuntu?), but I don’t mind having to put more work into it to achieve a better experience (maybe CachyOS?).

I would love to hear from you and, of course, if I’m missing any relevant information I’ll be more than happy to share it too.

Thank you very much! :D

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Between those two, CachyOS for sure. You are already running LMDE, imo there is zero benefit to dual-booting with Ubuntu… You are likely going to be running into the exact same problems you already are.

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The biggest problem with Linux distros is choice paralysis. I’d recommend Fedora/(K/X)Ubuntu/Mint as a first choice.

    Fedora is very up to date, so if you’re giddy to try new desktop environment updates (like gnome, KDE, not Cosmic until it’s more mature), then go Fedora with the spin you think you’ll like the most, visually.

    Ubuntu is updated all at once every year/2 years or so. By the time an update reaches Ubuntu, it’s already old news. It’s much more stable because there’s less to diagnose, and everything is essentially worked out before it hits your PC.

    Mint is Ubuntu, but heavily modified with user friendly changes in mind. From what I’ve seen though, the default theme is really dated, visually, and may not have creature comforts (I haven’t used mint in over a decade).

    Bazzite is for you if you are afraid to brick your computer with a stray terminal command; it’s designed to be very resilient to beginner mistakes by taking away root access from the user.


    CachyOS/Endevour (Arch based) are great distros, but you’ll be given a laundry list of choices for everything from your web browser, desktop environment, terminal, shell, file browser, and more. If you’re new to Linux, there’s simply too much choice for things you won’t understand yet. Even if you’re into customization, you’re better off trying one of the above as a baseline and going down the customization rabbit hole from there!

  • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    My experience with Ubuntu desktop has always been a real poor one but I realize other people like it. I’d go with cachy or endevourOS personally. My wife has probably less technical skill than you do and I’ve had her on endevourOS for nearly a year at this point. All she does is YouTube and gaming and it all runs near flawlessly. I also have both our systems dual booted but I also can’t remember the last time I booted into windows for either machine.

  • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Hm… LMDE is Debian under the hood, so if you have non standard requirements then you have to be flexible to make something to work, combining .deb repositories with other solutions like flatpaks, distrobox, compiling from source, nix, guix, appimages, wine prefixes, etc. Just don’t mess with system directories and libraries and you’re good.

    Maybe Mint were a better choice to a newbie, but in the end it’s almost the same thing with some nice driver utilities. Look for the release in December.

  • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Install Ubuntu and see if you can get your games and video editing software to work. If you can’t, go for CachyOS.

    Why Ubuntu first? Because millions of people have been using it for years. When something breaks, you’ll be able to fix it because someone else would have already encountered this issue before and reported it.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Why Ubuntu first? Because millions of people have been using it for years. When something breaks, you’ll be able to fix it because someone else would have already encountered this issue before and reported it.

      Funnily enough, that’s actially a source of some of my headaches with Ubuntu. I tend to run into really weird errors, and while there’s usually someone who’s dealt with it before it’s sometimes so long ago that the fixes are outdated

    • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’ll leave Debian for when I switch from LMDE, because I think I’ll still have the same issues I’m reporting on LMDE. Thank you anyways!

  • dreamy (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Definitely Fedora. It needs a bit of setting up, but otherwise has awesome security and rather recent packages.

  • DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Between these two, Cachy.

    If choice is open: Fedora.

    “Gaming” focussed distros are often a worse choice imo, because they offer zero performance benefit, are bloated in an attempt to bundle drivers out of the box, are harder to troubleshoot because worse documentation, and the preinstalled configs can cause headaches.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think you need to reassess your position on gaming distros. Nobara and Bazzite both use CachyOS’s optimizations while based on Fedora. And Nobara adds less software than Cachy’s gaming package, I think there’s only one package in Nobara I haven’t needed. And the documentation for Nobara has been easier to follow than Cachy/Arch.

      Granted, a decent chunk of Nobara’s benefits are from being run by Glorious Eggroll, the lead maintainer of CachyOS

    • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This quite represents the point where I’m at. I’m prioritizing CachyOS (although there are countersides and other gaming-focused OS’s that can end up being better for me) but got recommended Fedora multiple times by now, so, we’ll see, maybe I end up choosing Fedora. Thank you!

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Caution, dual-boot means you have to power down your system before you can start the other, if you share any file systems. Hibernate and then booting another distro will result in file system damage.

    The alternative would be a virtual machine.

    It can also occasionally mess up the grub configuration, which means you have to reinstall grub.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It never even occured to me to hibernate and then switching OS. I just use a command to reboot and tell grub to preselect the other OS and go do something else for 60 seconds while it reboots.

      It’s true that sometimes the grub config gets messed up, but in two years doing this, I’ve had to reinstall grub once (many more times if you count me distro-hopping).

    • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Woah, didn’t know that about grub. I hardly understand what it is, so it leaves me with a question: I don’t know if that makes any sense or goes directly against the nature of the bootloader definition but, can I switch one OS’s bootloader to Limine (got told by another user that grub failed for him with Cachy and switching to Limine solved it) and the other still be grub?

      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You can chain-load bootloaders but I am sceptical whether more complexity is helpful. At lesst grub is relatively easy to reinstall.

        • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Ok, I’ll stick to just grub or Limine if it assures more stability, I guess it would be overcomplicating it for nothing. Thanks!

  • LewdLemon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    If you want a good first Linux experience, stick with anything Ubuntu-/Debian-based; they are

    • stable workhorses, i.e. they don’t break on you as easily as rolling release distros like CachyOS.
    • wildly popular, i.e. you’ll find plenty of resources to help you get started (although, to be fair, the Arch wiki is also ridiculously detailed).

    Whatever you do, steer clear of immutable distros like Bazzite for now. As cool as the concept is (I run Bazzite on my gaming machine) - as soon as you do something “non-standard” (and modding your Minecraft .jar with Optifine already qualifies as such), you’ll have to fiddle with the terminal and distrobox containers, both of which will be alien concepts for you at the start and may be top much to make it a good first impression.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago
      • stable workhorses, i.e. they don’t break on you as easily as rolling release distros like CachyOS.

      I disagree. When I had Ububtu on my old server it would randomly break every few months. It was generally because I had an Nvidia card and the drivers needed updated, but it makes no sense for graphics drivers suddenly causing issues without an associated OS update

      • LewdLemon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I know of these famed Nvidia driver problems, but they’re

        a) not exclusive to Ubuntu; Nvidia is the party fucking up here, so they’re rumoured to be unstable throughout all distros and
        b) I’ve been running Debian-/Ubuntu-based Linux distros w/ Nvidia’s proprietary drivers for about 10 years now, and I haven’t come across a single issue with it in all that time.

        So. Well. That’s anecdotal evidence against anecdotal evidence, I guess.

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    CachyOS or Ubuntu?

    With all due respect to Ubuntu, but this isn’t even a comparison. I’d try to give you a fair answer if you’d stated Garuda, for example, or Nobara, or Bazzite instead of Ubuntu, because these distros actually put in an effort for gaming specifically, but Ubuntu? It’s a workstation distro and it’s gaming performance is basically whatever the default is on “Linux” as a whole.

    I have personally been using CachyOS for over two years now and I’ve been very happy with it. Their installer recognizes your gpu automatically and installs the right drivers for you.

    Not to take away from the other ones, I’m sure they have amazing work/performance, too, but this is my experience because I’ve tried all of the distros I’ve mentioned above and CachyOS was the best for me personally.

    Your mileage may vary of course. The best thing to do is try different distros and find out for yourself. Make sure your data is backed up while you hop between them until you chose one.

    • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Big second for CachyOS.

      I distro hop a fair bit but I keep coming back to Cachy. Personally, I choose to manage and maintain my machine entirely through the terminal, but with Shelly (the GUI package manager CachyOS ships with) and their built in updater, you could probably do all of your basic gaming and video editing for years without ever having to launch a terminal.

      Also, snapper backups functional out of the box. Something breaks? Just pick the most recent snapper image in the boot menu, and hold off on updating for a few days.

      On that note, Cachy slows their update releases a little more than Arch, so while it’s still bleeding edge, there’s still a little buffer time for stability sake, same with EndeavourOS, another great arch based distro.

      Ubuntu has its merits. It’s simple and it generally just works, but Cachy is not nearly difficult enough to pass on.

      • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        That sounds very good and gives me hope hahah. I’ll have it in mind. Thank youu

    • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Compared to other distros, do you feel it’s been tougher to maintain everything stable enough to not go crazy? Thanks!

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I haven’t had any major breakages with it beside that one time over a year ago where grub shit the bed and I had to reinstall it from a live environment. Then switched to limine and haven’t had a single issue like that ever since.

  • mbp@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Might just be my old experience (happy to learn otherwise) but dual booting ended up with more of a painful experience than not. When Windows would update, it would fuck my grub up and cause issues booting into Linux and Windows. You can fix it (most of the time) but expect to do it rather often; especially unpleasant as a beginner.

    I know there’s issues with GPU passthrough on vms but IDK if dual booting is the moves unless they seriously improved the experience in the last couple years.

    • Well1@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’ll try not to dual-boot unless it’s the only way; first I’ll stress all options inside LMDE (with makeresolvedeb, VMs, distrobox(?), etc.) and if it still doesn’t solve the issues I’m having in LMDE, I’ll dual-boot (preparing for these cases of course). Thanks!

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I would throw bazzite in as an option, especially for a new user.

    Bazzite has a good out of the box experience, is meant for gaming, and it uses an immutable distro.

    In my opinion the only reason people don’t like immutable distros is bad habits that are hard to break, or wanting highly custom system configurations, both do not apply to a new user. If you never go into the terminal there’s no difference, and if you do a system like brew works pretty well.

    The advantage of an immutable system are that you can’t mess up your system and it’s more secure. It also stops you from doing dangerous things or leasing habits that require modifying system packages without knowing what they do.

    For just gaming and desktop use (with KDE), it’s a good low maintenance system.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      In my opinion the only reason people don’t like immutable distros is bad habits that are hard to break, or wanting highly custom system configurations, both do not apply to a new user

      Disagree with the second point. The first thing I did when I finally swapped was to fiddle with it until it felt like what I was used to with Windows. Of course, that’s also the same thing I do in a Windows PC: Make it feel like an older less shit version of Windows.

      Over time, I started experimenting. Even use a heavily modified Gnome for my laptop which is a big change. Maybe I just like to mess with stuff.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        But you can still theme the hell out of plasma and it will just save to your ~/.local or something, that doesn’t need to hit the system packages.

        I am curious if you have examples when you needed something that didn’t work with bazzite, as my opinions are opinions that can be changed

        Personally I found Fedora atomic really good for being able to update the rpm os tree if you do want to tweak heavily, but I found fedora without dnf was not a good place (it works with brew, but they don’t include it and I think they still push toolbx, which is great, but not a casual user system).

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I am curious if you have examples when you needed something that didn’t work with bazzite, as my opinions are opinions that can be changed

          Fyi, I’m not the same guy, and I haven’t used Bazzite. But on SteamOS, Syncthing has been a headache to try to get working right. The flatpak for it is unmaintained and the only other way to get it working is setting up a systemd service that gets wiped with every OS update

          • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Ouch that sucks, thanks for the example.

            I guess that’s one of those cases that’s hard to get working with pure user level permissions.

            As I said, I think Fedora atomic would let you update the os tree, but can see that being a problem on bazzite or similar.