• snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    6 days ago

    >connects to site with NoScript  
    >nothing loads  
    >checkmate 😎

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is actually much worse for privacy than leaving everything stock, because a site can tell you aren’t downloading or running any javascript, and that immediately puts you in an extremely tiny bucket of people it needs to differentiate from, making any differences visible via IP/TCP/TLS/HTML/CSS much more unique.

      And yes, fingerprinting is possible with just HTML and/or CSS… I would argue even moreso without JS.

      • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Fingerprinting can usually identify you uniquely. So even if only two people in the world were using NoScript, it would still be more private than getting fingerprinted.

        Edit: btw I’m talking about Javascript fingerprinting. Other methods like HTML and CSS are far less effective and rarely seen in the wild.