alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agoMadden should not be 70$lemmy.worldimagemessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageMadden should not be 70$lemmy.worldalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square13linkfedilink
minus-squareXIIIesq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 years agoNew releases used to be £40 when I was a kid (twenty years ago), given inflation, £70 sounds not too bad.
minus-squareMrNesser@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 years agoThat $40 included plastic packaging and a disc both of which largely don’t exist anymore.
minus-squareShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·3 years agoNever was a significant cost. So complaining, you are never going to get you 50c of plastic to burn down the planet to spite publishers.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 years ago40? I remember when they were 20. Hell, I remember when you could get slightly older titles for 10. I used to go to Egghead and buy slightly older games with my allowance.
minus-squareShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·3 years agoNo you don’t. You are just imagining. At no point ever was $20 typical for a new game.
New releases used to be £40 when I was a kid (twenty years ago), given inflation, £70 sounds not too bad.
That $40 included plastic packaging and a disc both of which largely don’t exist anymore.
Never was a significant cost. So complaining, you are never going to get you 50c of plastic to burn down the planet to spite publishers.
40? I remember when they were 20. Hell, I remember when you could get slightly older titles for 10. I used to go to Egghead and buy slightly older games with my allowance.
No you don’t. You are just imagining. At no point ever was $20 typical for a new game.