Enjoy your cuck licensed software purists!

of course, where else do you think the shitposts come from? we must protect it by sending a probe to it

nothing to be nervous about, its literally software engineering and project management 101, programmer writes code reviewer catches bugs, nothing goes to production. this happens all the time, has happened in the linux kernel way before LLMs were a thing

who do you think sets the prices?

As some one here summarised it: it is to stop AI companies from getting free advertisement and endorsement, the kernel itself goes through an unbelievable amount of scrutiny so the disclosure requirement was irrelevant

its a movement, i dont endorse the projects themselves but it sends a clear message

Tell that to all the proprietary software that got OpenSourced

People against LLM parrot the same arguments again and again that it has simply lost its original meaning.

copyright status is debatable

debatable by who? who is going to settle this debate?, the courts who serve corporate greed?, Legislation made by politicians lobbied by SaaS companies? Anthropic? OpenAi? Microsoft?

The “Copyright is debatable/ its just a plagiarism machine” stance is not the Leftist/ pro FOSS gotcha argument you think it is. The point of the FOSS movement was to have total freedom over software, and that freedom includes the ability to study, learn and use it in ways it was not intended for. To stand as the antitheses of that is make Steve Balmer happy

I don’t think restricting what people can post is a good idea if you are looking to grow a community

I advocate for a disclosure, blanket removal feels like censorship; even vibe coded slop is a project that might generate interest if it was made to solve some problem or showcase a new frontier, nature of OSS will push the slop out of the project eventually.

When I say “slop”, I refer to a huge codebase that does what it advertise but has no documentation on what it does internally and the primary poster cannot adequately explain what it does(code mudball esentially). but if its well documented and looks like it was put together with care, with rhyme and reason than I will defend against calling it slop

go local

manifest destiny on the windows front

and it’s fustrating seeing the acceptance of AI code into it.

and its frustating to see pushback against it.

guys linus is pushing retirement, the nobodies shitting this much on his frankly amazing legacy is astounding.

yall would be running cuck license Operating Systems if it werent for him and RMS

dont forget to add a /s if you dont want the downvotes

it was a code review that caught a easy to miss race condition, it happens all the time, happened in 2003 2010 2020 now in 2026

op is making it sound like Linus pushed something into the mainline

but local models exist, they are a direct threat to anthropic/OpenAi/Xai thats why we must invest our time to make proprietary models irrelevant.

do you even know what a race condition is, what a code review is and what its job is? ask chatgpt

if i remember correctly rpcs3 actually does recompilation on the fly

Warning! very unpopular opinion