Because neither of the two parties are good for the climate.

You seem to struggle with reading

You already know genocide denial is not just denying genocide, but also denying the severity of it - which you do.

As has been pointed out many times: The majority of palestinian deaths occurred under Biden. You continually ignoring this is part of genocide denial. Somehow less deaths is worse to you.

You can say whatever you want, your actions are what matter, and what you did is you denied the genocide carried out by the democrats and your suggestion to stop it, was to vote for democrats who are running on continuing the genocide.
Your arguments never managed to engage with what anyone else wrote and instead you kept repeating the same thing again and again - that thing being a weird strawman that no one was arguing for.

So I dont really see any Marx in you, you are quite obviously dogshit at rhetorics. Plenty of Hitler particles though.

Well I would love to move on to another discussion and point out the many faulty assumptions and assertions you have made there, but to do that we have to do what I have described many times already. You seem to struggle with reason and civil discussion, consider looking inwards to deal with you having a hard time with simple challenges to your beliefs and a pattern of changing the topic instead of engaging with the text at hand, when that text refutes your pointless vibes-based anecdotal evidence.

You are making a claim but you have no proof for it. What hasn’t worked “here” whereever that is? If you are talking about socialism in the east block it very clearly did work. It was massively popular, improved the living conditions for the population and only fell after decades of capitalist subversion and even then it had to be done through a military coup. And, as the evidence available shows, it is missed today.
Elsewhere it is still massively succesful to this very day.
So I dont understand your question, it seems to be based on a completely fallacious understanding of the world.

The blowback from this proxy war will make 9/11 look like a birthday party

“the wrong thing” and its genocide denial and strawmanning

I have actually made 0 ad hominem so far. You are confusing “insults” with “attacking the argument through the character”. Of course you wouldn’t know that, halfwit that you are.

The rebuttal has been presented, you have failed to engage with it, you are the one halting discussion.

I don’t really get what you’re saying, but alright

this is condescending

Correct, you are behaving poorly so I am treating you in kind

Distracting from the main point

The only one distracting from anything is you. You are the one who seeks discussion and then flees at challenge, I am holding you to it.

You are now attempting to give yourself a plausible exit where you can save face, which is very funny since the only audience is you and me, yet your ego can still not handle it. Sadly the exit-strategy you’ve sought is ill-fitting, since both you and I are aware that you are the one who has been avoiding discussion, instead seeking to change the subject at every turn. It is no surprise that you would do something like this, you seem to be a fucking idiot.
I still hold out hope you will be able to do the bare minimum, but I cannot be disappointed by you anymore.

So far the only thing I have proposed is that you are wrong about your point still standing and I have supplied additional evidence to supply this. You keep trying to argue against something else because you have a weak and prideful mind, too fragile to handle being wrong.

Yes? Sometimes the vibe of hexbear is similar to the vibe of the thing I referenced. I don’t really understand what the confusion is.

What do you feel this link provides?

Then why don’t we have this as our current form of government? How to you propose to get everyone to buy in to this in the US? If you can’t reduce it to practice, this is just impractical Internet bullshit talk.

Finish your argument before you start a new one sweetie.

For us to be able to go deeper into discussion we need to first agree on the facts that form the basis of the discussion, which we do not at the moment. You have to either accept that your point was wrong and integrate that acceptance into your line of argument or argue for your point being correct - This is done by either supplying sufficient empirical data that helps create some synthesis with the rest of the data or you go through the given data and explain why it is faulty or insufficient as a basis for a rebuttal.

As the rest of the comment you are responding to explains, you have still yet to do this.

I do not understand your question

It’s a reference to a specific thing

Hexbear has a lot of vegans.
Vegans like beans.
“Beans” sounds sort of like “beanis” which sounds like “penis”.
Hexbear has a comm committed to making bad posts and a general fondness for stupid humor (I guess most everyone does, just depends on what they consider humor).

These four conditions combined created a hurricane of beans.

I joined because I wanted access to a reddit-style place that wasn’t part of the neoliberal echo chamber that is culture in the imperial core, but I had gotten tired of the bear site.

I like the instance, I like the moderation, I like how its widely federated. I wish it did not have downvotes like hexbear does, but I find the .ml community to be much better in general, though a bit too sectarian at times.

I prefer .ml to hexbear because hexbear has big time “midwestern covid conscious lesbian bar” vibes at times.

My main issue with .ml is how other instances act. It’s pretty common to see ridiculous lies about .ml with a bunch of upvotes and the OP is never able to provide any proof when asked for it. But people still believe it because it’s .ml
Same with how a lot of users’ brains will shut down when they see anything they disagree with posted by someone from this instance. All rationality goes out the window and they retreat to a frustrating ad hominem of “you’re using this instance, thus I dont have to take it seriously” - “ml detected, opinion disregarded” it’s so sad to see people be so scared.

I also see users from other instances cry about .ml moderation. Personally I feel like it is pretty evenhanded and fair, but moderation will always skew against outsiders. I’ve been banned from some communities due to incivility while the equally uncivil person I was replying to was not. That’s just how it is everywhere, I dont go about pretending like thats some special feature of .world.

So all in all I like it and my issue with it is mainly other instances.

Schrödingers progressive