
deleted by creator

deleted by creator
Yeah, and who do you think is more contributing to climate change?
Your privilege is showing. I honestly don’t care anymore. Any action that can threaten the status quo always has some shit coming out of the wood work claiming that more people are helped by the status quo than are being hurt. Don’t care anymore. I’ve heard every permutation of this discussion by now.
Sure, it’s less robust, but line must go up.
That’s already happening from the endless CO2 use.
I’m ok with Amazon’s data centers going down too. The internet has grown far too centralized anyway.
That episode was weird because it didn’t exactly portray that stuff as sane, despite having Jewish writers, including Seinfeld right around that time. I don’t know much about Larry David’s politics and beliefs, but it could have been him taking a swipe at Jerry and other weird Jews. It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve seen a Jewish writer criticize their own community.
What’s the deal with Age of Consent Laws!?
Also, what was with that episode where a child perused Elaine? https://seinfeld.fandom.com/wiki/Adam_Lippman


Ew. Time to switch to BSD.
It’s not petty enough for Trump.



Even if it’s true, “My noble protests” vs “their violent riots.” What ever could she be protesting? I’m sure you’ll tell me the CIA is behind it.

Not the people I live around, but they’re lost causes in more ways than one.


“So many AI researchers have started smoking as a way of signaling to other researchers how much they believe in AI,” Sankar said in an interview on CBS News’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday.
This is the first clue that’s it BS. I would like to believe that the techbros are doing it, but techbros aren’t “AI researchers.” They actually know the limits to their work. If Shyam Sankar wont name names, it’s not happening. At least not in any appreciable numbers.
The Epstein Files were released by Trump. They’re not completely trustable, especial when they can just remove whatever they want without it looking foraged.
Also, I’ve been referencing the run up to the 2016 election when Russia was ramping up their misinformation campaigns. They’ve had outlines for these things for a long time.

Also, I called them the Epstein class. Epstein might have been involved, but there’s probably hundreds or thousands of spooks would are doing shit. Epstein himself stands apart because he was sloppy.
Spies and spooks don’t do it out of a sense of loyalty or professionalism. They like doing it. Even if Mossad or the CIA were completely aligned against Russia, that doesn’t stop their assets from fucking around.
It’s all interconnected. Domestic capitalists? Foreign capitalists? They’re all the same because they don’t view themselves as nations of any nation. They’re allegiance is only to themselves and use each other as opportunities. They can only trust each other when they have backmail on each other, which is the real main purpose of Epstein’s parties are for.
Zuck allowing foreign propaganda on his platform is not because he believes in Putin’s cause, but because he might want a favor from Putin or Russia in the future. To him, it’s a capitalist investment.
There’s plenty of examples in history of opportunists tweaking the news to rile up bigotry for a profit. History never stopped happening.
I think they were in cohorts with each other. The social media sites could have shut all that down overnight, but didn’t. They’re all part of the Epstein class.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spn0MJZr-QQ