They are not similar, executing a man for killing 13 people including a pregnant woman and injuring (at least) 32 other people is infinitely more justifiable than executing someone for blasphemy. It’s actually amazing he wasn’t killed already, regardless of how you feel about the execution - which I’m against.
Let’s be clear, I’m not advocating for the Trump admin. That being said, there’s a wide berth between the actions of the current administration/U.S. and Iran’s. For one thing, many people in the U.S. aren’t simply going along with what the admin is doing and while people have died, we aren’t talking about ICE opening fire into crowds of protestors. The IRGC is not like this, they just kill people for whatever reason they want it seems (including blasphemy apparently).
We aren’t there yet. Whether we reach that point remains to be seen, but the execution of a terrorist who killed 13 people and wounded (I think) 32 others is vastly different from killing women for speaking blasphemy.
Again, I’m not advocating for public executions or even Nidal’s execution - I think he’s already in a living hell of his own making and to make him a martyr would be fulfilling his wishes. I am of the opinion we should not do that, and I’m also of the opinion that this is the crueler option. Shit’s complicated, yo.
If a sociopath checks all the boxes for ‘normal’ except for understanding that other people have their own thoughts and feelings, they’re still a sociopath.
Not saying their ex-wife is a sociopath, just saying that you usually need multiple litmus tests (colloquial) before you can determine a greater truth about someone.
There’s this concept called lathering, I think it’ll change the way you look at soap.
Comparing the execution of Nidal to this woman is a little strange. I’m not advocating for public executions, at least I hope that’s obvious, but to claim they’re even remotely similar is an extreme exaggeration.
When a breakfast burrito costs me 9 bucks and fills me up for most of the day, why would I opt to spend 20 bucks on lunch and less food?
No, we aren’t - but we’re in for a hell of a ride.
While I doubt we’ll ever have the numbers to weigh this correctly, I’m willing to bet there are more people with bad eyes at any given time than there are people who are drunk driving.
Have you been to India?
Edit: I’m gonna take that as a no from you and whoever else downvoted me.
Some people have bad eyes
Sad thing is Susan Dell used to be genuinely pretty. There’s got to be some kind of pyschological phenomena happening here - why do beautiful conservative women destroy themselves as they age? Is aging really such a terrifying thing?
This is one of the dumbest things I’ve seen
However, I’m not French, it’s not the 90s, they’ve been married for 20 years now. By all accounts it’s been fulfilling and satisfying marriage…
I don’t think the first two points matter, but yes - if he’s happily married then there really isn’t anything to be done. How it started was wrong, and I do wonder what Macrons life would have been like had he not been manipulated by someone 24 years older than him. Not that it matters, what’s done is done.
A 15 year old does not have the mental capacity to understand that they are being groomed. Grooming should be illegal, however it’s tied to the legal precedent set by age of consent laws.
I can’t believe I’m having this conversation, a 17 year old should not be in a relationship with a 41 year old.
Who could imagine a .mler would make a post regarding the Trump regime about Democrats?
It has the obscure unbreakable locks with weird keys, the ammo boxes are accurate to the games, umbrella corporation is about what you’d expect, the main character isn’t a fucking super hero (come on, give them a few movies before throwing Redfield/Kennedy in there)… idk seems like a much more grounded adaptation.
You technically drink split pea soup, and that stuff is pretty good