OK we’re done here.

I realize I’m probably just enabling your unhealthy Hasan obsession by continuing to talk to you. Please talk to someone, either a family member or a mental health professional. You are not well.

Hasan is not your friend, he’s just an internet guy. You can think for yourself, you don’t need him to think for you.

GOP voter suppression out in full force aren’t you?

PSA: Ignore all these accounts that are just saying variations of “BOTH SIDES”. This is a voter suppression tactic.

Republicans are fascist, Democrats are not. This may be your last chance to vote against fascism.

Because they’re talking about the issues the voters care about most.

But not to worry, you can think for yourself about which party is likely to be better on the climate. Is it the party that started building wind power projects? Or is it the party that actually paid money to cancel those projects?

Yeah it should have a clever name like most opensource projects, preferably with a clever recursive acrynomyn. Maybe call it something like the “InfoBay Manipulation Analytical Computational Universal Network Technology.”

Then why did she initially endorse Abdul before his campaign rejected her ass like 2 days before endorsing the MAGA candidate Mike Rogers?

Because of this ad: https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/disgusting-pro-el-sayed-ad-212940137.html?guccounter=1

I don’t think it quite rises to antisemitism, but as a Canadian I see the same mentality as Trump. Trump blames Canada for the US not having healthcare, and apparently Sayed blames Israel for the US not having healthcare. Both are lying and promoting xenophobia.

Sayed is clearly bad at building coalitions. This is thing with Leftists. There’s an expectation that everyone should automatically jump to support them. Everyone that questions anything must be a ZIONIST!!!

Politics is about building coalitions and making compromises. One of Sayed’s major weaknesses is that the working class feels like he abandoned them because something happening on the other side of the world is more important to him than they are. He was struggling to build a coalition so the Dems brought out the big guns (Obama) to help him build a coaltion.

I’m pretty sure he has the anti-Israel crowd voting for him even without the ad. What he needs is to show he cares about other issues. All he had to do is agree to pull the ad (it’s useless to him anyway) and he’d have secured Haley Steven’s endorsement. It’s a really stupid move.

But that’s leftism, isn’t it? You don’t need to make compromises, you don’t need to make smart political moves, because you’re right and everyone that disagrees with you is an EVIL ZIONIST!

I’m from Canada and the US is like bizarro world to me. Here it’s just the conservatives that nominates weirdos that conform to internet memes that as candidates. They lose because being an elected representative requires more than just conforming to internet memes.

Sayed, is a weak candidate. You can’t see that because he conforms to your internet memes, and there is nothing else other than your memes and EVIL ZIONISTS! So now what should be an easy win (Rogers is a very weak candidate and Trump is dragging down the GOP besides that) will be a nail-biter on Tuesday.

You obviously want to hate the Dems, you ignore the fact that they brought in Obama to help him. You’ll likely be voting for the GOP in 2028, you’re just looking for an excuse at this point.

BTW, I just checked and yes Hasan is indeed on the front page of twitch.tv, a website owned by Jeff Bezos. Not logged in, it’s just how twitich.tv is for everyone.

You might think you’re in a special little secret club of the socialist resistance, but you’re actually just consuming content actively promoted one of the wealthiest men in the world.

I think this is typical leftist behavior of spending more time attacking Democrats than attacking Republicans. I mean why do you have so much interest in a candidate that’s out of the race, rather than the person Sayed is actually running against?

The Democrats have really going to bat for Sayed. Obama going to Michigan appearing in ads with him. I see even the Bulwark crowd going full on about Rogers being a racist. Obama wouldn’t have gone to Michigan if this was a lock for Sayed, he would’ve gone somewhere else instead.

Learn to read the signs, Sayed is a weak candidate. Obama wouldn’t be putting in so much effort for a strong candidate. Some things are personal, Hayley Stevens isn’t going full MAGA, she just has concerns about Sayed’s association with antisemitsm. What everyone wants is for Sayed to strongly condemn antisemitism, but he’s a little weak on that, which is indeed concerning. Everyone needs to decide for themselves whether that’s ok or not. His association with Hasan “America deserved 911” Piker, is a really big liability too. Many working class people in Michigan feel betrayed by the uncommitted movement which Sayed was a part of. Sayed has a lot of baggage, which is why he’s a weak candidate. His past is a legitimate cause for concern, being soft on antisemitism is a huge cause for concern. I personally think Stevens is wrong (Rogers sucks more than Sayed), but Sayed is certainly problematic.

Bottom line is an endorsement by Obama is a much bigger thing than an endorsement by Hayley Stevens. If you actually wanted Sayed to win, you’d downplay what Stevens said and amplify Obama’s endorsement. Hasan is focussing on Stevens (ignoring Obama) to make a case against Democrats. Gee… wonder why Hasan is on the front page of a website owned by Jeff Bezos?

It’s about 50/50 whether Sayed loses a race that could’ve been an easy win if had have been a stronger candidate. Everyone knows this, the DSA crowd is looking for someone to blame if their bullshit causes the Dems to lose a Senate seat. Hopefully he wins, but it’s gonna be really tight. And that’s really saying something given how much Rogers sucks.

Hasan and the DSA are a huge liability. Everyone knows this, including Hasan.

You stood in front of a gun aimed at a Jeffrey Class billionaire.

So now you’re making implied threats of violence?

You’ve gone too deep on this shit. I don’t even know this Dan Saltman is.

You should really take some time to think about things. If someone thinks Hasan and Trump have similarities, either they like both Trump and Hasan, or they dislike both of them. It’s not at all rational to think someone that thinks they’re both the same must love Trump and hate Hasan. You’re thoughts are very scattered and irrational.

It’s not healthy to have this level of para-social attachment to someone on your screen. Hasan is just a guy that says controversial things on the internet to make money. He’s not your friend, he’s certainly not the messiah. Your level of devotion to this internet guy is an indication that you are mentally unwell. I’m not saying this to be rude or to “own you” or whatever. You should seek out some help from a professional.

This is not healthy.

This seems serious enough to warrant a Dishonorable Dollar Discharge.

You are simultaneously mocking the free press while also mocking the hardships of people in Ukraine.

When the way you talk is identical to how tankies talk, people are going to call you a tankie.

Just tax the wealthy. They obviously have too much money. When you have that much money you don’t just have it in a bank account having inflation eating away at it.

You have to invest it but the investment market is oversaturated. There are no longer any good investments so you have to pump up the bad investments and dump it before everyone else does.

A stock market is supposed to be a way to streamline making connections between people that have money to invest and companies that need investment. But with everything oversaturated, it’s just a casino. Go long before everyone else does, short before everyone else does.

The wealthy also want to hedge and put a bunch of money somewhere safe. So they invest in real estate. So now a home is an investment, and that’s too oversaturated and it’s too expensive for regular people to own a home.

Tax the wealthy, they have too much money and it’s causing serious problems for everyone. People going on and on about the problems being impossible to solve and we need a revolution or whatever are just distracting everyone from the obvious problem that has an obvious solution. The wealthy have too much money, the government can tax the wealthy if we push them to do that.

Oh come on, who is really doing the scamming here?

Who’s going to make most of the money on this? It will be scummy lawyers, that’s who. We shouldn’t be handing a whole bunch of money to scammy lawyers just because they can imagine a hypothetical idiot that doesn’t know that the McRib is processed meat. Just do an image search on McRib and tell me that there is any way someone could think that isn’t processed meat. How the fuck would you have a sandwich that has bone in the meat?

What are even the damages on this? How would you determine who are the idiots that bought a McRib thinking it wasn’t processed meat?

If you’re really against scams, you should be against these lawyers using the legal system to scam a bunch of money for themselves.

What’s next, the makers of Goldfish crackers should be sued because hypothetically there could be an idiot out there somewhere that thinks they contain goldfish meat?

We aren’t fighting back against the corruption and scaminess in our society by just allowing some other group of people run the scams.

Fascism holds both a social and economic definition that just does not align with the actions and history of the CCP.

I’m not talking about historical CCP, I’m talking about the CCP of today. Today it is dominated by xenophobic misogynistic billionaires. Xi is President for life because of the belief that only a strongman can protect China from the evil foreigners and run the economy (which is a capitalist economy). Labour unions are illegal in China, workers are oppressed. No matter the CCP may have been in the past, it is a fascist party today.

What? We are operating under the commonly agreed upon and well defined terms utilized by those teaching basic political science all over the world.

I actually have a science degree. Political “science” was not a credit towards my degree, it’s in the humanities category. They call it “science” to try to give it legitimacy, but there really isn’t a whole lot of science going on there. Too many old communist professors that are in denial of a lot of things. They have tenure so continue to have lectures about how “real communism” has never been tried (google the “no true scotsman” fallacy) and a lot of apologism over the atrocities committed by communist regimes. You’re not supposed to take those poli sci classes seriously, it’s just an easy credit if you don’t challenge anything the old commie profs say.

Lol, late stage communism?

Why not? You have a Pavlovian response to the phrase “late stage capitalism” so I guess late stage communism isn’t something that’s part of your conditioning. Multiple communist regimes have failed, so if we’re actually doing real political science (and not just going along with whatever the commie prof says) it would be something that would be studied and the patterns could be identified. It’s really backwards that a system that’s failed many many times is never studied in terms of having a “late stage”, while the system that hasn’t failed is the one you assume must inevitably fail.

We know that central planning doesn’t work for a developed economy (it’s too complex for a small group of people to manage), communist regimes have to allow some degree of economic freedom so the economy can function. Increased economic freedom results in ideas spreading, which means there’s a greater pressure for political freedom on the ruling regime. Hardliners don’t want this (it’s a threat to their power) coups and crackdowns start occurring. Eventually the people realize the whole system is dishonest and just stop showing up to work, or do the bare minimum. Malaise takes over. The whole thing becomes untenable and we see economic and political collapse. Late stage communism in a nutshell.

But sure, go on pretending that communism is super successful and go along with a religious-like prophecy of “late stage capitalism” that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. Like why are we now in “late stage capitalism” now but we weren’t in the 1930s? Why did the policies implemented to get out of the Great Depression work, and why wouldn’t they work now?

John Maynard Keynes > Karl Marx. Marx identified some real problems with capitalism, Keynes found a solution to those problems. The Marxist solution failed, the Keynesian solution succeeded. It’s obvious to anyone that understands anything about economics. Communism is obsolete, it only exists now as a rationalization for authoritarianism.

I will not place my trust in the URLs of men.

I was there, Gandalf. I was there when the goatse links first appeared on the internet. I was there the day the URLs of Men failed. It should have ended that day, but evil was allowed to endure. There’s no strength left in the URLs of Men.

I think you just proved everything I wrote to be correct. You are in a cult, Hasan is the cult leader, and you feel you need to harass people that dare criticize the leader. Following me around and posting harassing replies proves what I said to be absolutely correct.

So yeah, in a reply to a DM you sent me, I said Hasan and his followers have a lot in common with Trump and his followers. Wow you really exposed me… I really try to keep it a big secret that I dislike both Donald Trump and Hasan Piker. Really great exposee there. Almost as mind blowing as when the MAGAs exposed Jack Smith for going to a basketball game.

Is all the stuff you put about the Epstein class just standard boiler plate you use in all your harassment campaigns? That’s just lazy.

Most of the stuff you list are actually liberal policies. You know liberals those evil enemies of the tankies?

Communism is about state control of the economy. Shit that failed every time it was tried.

The whole point of the communist propaganda is to make you hate liberals that want the same things you do, and to make you spout communist slogans that make you sound like a crazy person. If you just said “I want to tax the rich, bust up big corporations, and implement universal healthcare” most people will agree with that. But If you rant on like “seize the means of production late stage capitalism eat the rich stalin did notihng wrong, china is a utopia blah blah blah” everyone rightly considers you a crazy person and nothing happens.

Maybe just stick to talking about the policies you want and stop with the commie talk and maybe things might happen. But then you would be saying the same thing as liberals oh noes! That’s bad according to the influencers that are heavily promoted by corporate social media. Always gotta do what corporate social media influencers tell you! Liberal are baaaaaaaad. They just talk about raising taxes on the rich and improving healthcare, they might not have even read Marx! BAD LIBERALS!

Yeah so it’s a reverse boycott. After we buy a lot from this company everyone will understand why this company isn’t a viable business!

Meanwhile in the real world, investors see an uptick in usage. Sure it’s not making money yet, but they project more growth because it looks it may be a viable business.

The companies paying for subscriptions see that the employees are using the service a lot and keep paying for those subscriptions. It’s silly to assume that a company paying for a subscription for AI isn’t going to know the tokens were wasted. If they knew that, they’d fire the employee doing this because it’s maliciously wasting company resources. If no one is fired for wasting tokens, we can logically assume the company paying for the subscriptions think the tokens are being used for valid work purposes and continue paying for the subscriptions.

What would actually prove to a company that an AI subscription is worthless is using zero tokens. Why would they pay for a service their employees don’t use?

Methinks this is a person that is actually using AI and feeling guilty over it. So its… “yeah I’m just using to to waste tokens to fight the power!” That or a brainrotted accelerationist.

Just another bullshit cog in the bullshit economy.

Why not both?

Boycott.

But you don’t even want to change which brand of Mac & Cheese you buy, it would inconvenience you too much. The point of your movement is to do performative to gain social media clout, not to do anything that would inconvenience yourselves in any way.

And yes Kraft is big, maybe boycotting them won’t have much of an effect. But bullying someone smaller like a B-list musical artist also won’t have a big effect in terms of society, but it will have a big effect on that particular musical artist.

This whole thing proves that you’re movement is weak, you know you’re weak, and you engage in bullying solely to try to convince yourselves that you are strong. You’re too weak to try to take on someone big like Robert Kraft (the real source of this particular controversy), so you don’t even try.

You’re Karens shouting at the cashier instead of just taking your business elsewhere. The point is to make a scene and bully people, not to do anything real (that’s too much effort!) that will actually make any kind of a difference.

Sorry forbad english. Am Hulk.

Hulk no like Reddit.

Hulk SMASH Reddit!

Thank.

Yes be cause the other herd that wants to retry communism after it’s failed miserably multiple times is a much better option.

Crazy idea, but maybe we just tax the wealthy? There’s always going to be idiots in charge of stuff no matter what the system is, but maybe we could just limit the power (and therefore mitigate the damage that can be done) of those with power.