*chalked up to

Looks pretty similar to a game I had growing up called Mastermind.

For the third time; “some people lie so nobody should care about the truth” is not the argument you think it is.

I believe you are referring to North Sentinel Island.

Gotta watch out for those un-walled houses though, I knew somebody who got one once… thing looked just like a gazebo.

I have to say the same thing I said to the other commenter; I’m really not sure that “some people lie so nobody should care about the truth” is the argument you think it is.

Junior developers’ code always goes through more review, yes. Also, I’m not sure “some people lie so nobody should care about the truth” is the argument you think it is.

Yeah, my problem is more with getting them to appear in the first place.

Something like a raspberry pi with an activity book might be the thing, games are pretty advanced if you don’t know the basics of data handling and such.

On the contrary, a small piece of text that says “this code deserves more review because humans may not have seen it” is absolutely necessary.

All this is doing is making it so I can hide that I didn’t touch the code.

They can be done without AI. Mario 64 has been out for years.

Meanwhile the literal highest selling game of all time is… Tetris, the game that is quite famously Soviet…

Having nothing to hide doesn’t mean having something to share. To believe otherwise is entitlement at best, but more likely goes hand in hand with our current rape/control culture.

Slaves

Trail of Tears

You are joking right?

You know that a bunch of people who didn’t want to be were sent to those states and are stuck there right?

Actually, I don’t hate it. I imagine they would be useful in a touch first UI and as snapping handles regardless. They might be a little big as presented but I could actually see this working, especially as titlebar dragging space has been encroached upon by tabs and menus and such.

I didn’t ask for examples of positive boomer humor I asked for a

primary source that backs up what you are saying

an editorial that describes itself as opinion is absolutely not that.

Putting that aside, even those examples don’t answer the original question, how is this post boomer humor? To which nobody has been able to provide an answer that isn’t also chastising me for not innately understanding the world the exact same way as other people. I hope someday somebody treats your confusion with the same level of disdain.

Exactly how am I moving the goal posts by saying that an editorial that literally bills itself as opinion isn’t a definition of “boomer humor”? You have officially lost me with this.

If you don’t care then stop responding.