Well my fiance and I started dating with 19 and 20, respectively, but we still talked about our future early on

I’ve been with my fiance for over 4 years now, and we’ve kinda always been very open about how we want our life to be and where it might lead us

Get in more

You know, the fact that you wrote ex fiance actually kinda goes against your point

I’m not talking about salaried management. Of course you need those positions. I’m talking about the owner/shareholders, who do no/next to no work, and reap the profits of the company.

This isn’t about small companies with a handful of people, it’s about the ones with thousands of employees. And being a freelancer basically means not having anyone beneath you.

The whole point is about the massive amount of surplus value the employer takes off the employee. In small companies, due to a lack of machines, experience, connections in the industry and other things, there needs to be more work done for the same profit. So the employers will have to work themselves to rival other major corporations.

You shouldn’t see these type of things as a critique on the person, but on the system. You have to exploit your workers, otherwise you won’t be able to compete with the ones that do.

If you are a fair boss, and you give your employees the actual value of their work, you don’t have any to invest, and will eventually fall behind on technology. So the more someone exploits others, the more they’re able to invest in tech, therefore increasing their workers productivity, and the amount of money they can extract.

The owner of a major company has to be a major exploiter, otherwise they wouldn’t be where they are.

That’s why the problem is the system, not the person

I saw quite a lot of positive stuff about him on reddit, I’ll assume just a passable PR team?

I’m not American, so I know very little about newscom, what’s so bad about him?