Ostfriesentee

Hi, hier gibt’s ja ne Biografiefunktion.

  • 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 19th, 2025

help-circle


  • I’ve become a heavy user of Noctalia and figured these issues out.

    I’ve been through these: CachyOS+Hyprland+Noctalia ↓ CachyOS+MangoWM+Noctalia ↓ CachyOS+Umbriel+Noctalia

    I honestly recommend Umbriel. It’s a nice mix of Niri and Hyprland and is very customizable. Also better integration with Noctalia.

    Anyway: The fixes are the same.

    sudo noctalia-greeter passwordless-sync enable “$USER”

    For passwordless theme syncing between shell and greeter. My setup also syncs the wallpaper to hyprlock via a Noctalia hook.

    If the keyring authorization thing shows up after login with Noctalia greeter, edit /etc/pam.d/greetd to include:

    auth optional pam_gnome_keyring.so

    in the auth section and

    session optional pam_gnome_keyring.so auto_start

    in the session section (obviously this requires gnome-keyring).

    That should fix all weird pop-ups. Been very happy.

    COSMIC I’ll have to check out. But I’ve been so invested in customizing my Noctalia/Umbriel setup it’s going to be hard to switch. I really like my look and feel right now.


  • Newsom, in his veto letter to the legislature, said he was supportive of “protecting sensitive personal information of Californians,” but that a “categorical ban on sharing that information goes a step too far.”

    The governor pointed to existing state laws that require businesses to give consumers the option to limit sharing their information and budget constraints that would hinder implementing and enforcing the law.

    Newsom also signed a handful of other bills strengthening the state’s privacy rules:

    • SB 923 expands the scope of the California Consumer Privacy Act to require businesses to delete all personal information they have on a consumer upon request, not just data collected directly from the consumer. Online-only businesses will be required to provide a webform or portal for deletion requests.
    • AB 883 shortens the time with which data brokers must comply with a data deletion request from 45 to 30 days. It requires elected officials and judges receive information on how to access the deletion mechanism, known as DROP, to protect their information.

    Other data privacy laws still awaiting Newsom’s signature or veto include:

    • SB 690 would remove the private right to action for alleged violations under a wiretapping law, allowing just the state attorney general to pursue such legal challenges.
    • AB 2561 would prohibit an operating system or application from re-adjusting a user’s privacy setting without consent.









  • I think the US banning open-weight/open-source models could be a real concern. Anthropic is certainly pushing for it with their weird self-propagating local open-weight worm in smart TVs narrative that makes little sense. But I don’t think other countries would follow suit, because it wouldn’t be in their interest, given that they are not currently in control of the frontier models and open models giving them an edge.

    Remember SETI@home? If compute is the bottleneck, why shouldn’t people all over the world get together to train their own models? Cyber security would be a concern, of course. Such a cluster could be misused. And the underlying question of copyright remains. But if lots of people were able to get together to create open-source software, lots of people can get together to train better, transparent models. The EU also offers free training clusters if you apply, if I’m not mistaken. I also read about an open-source LLM somewhere. Not only open-weight, open-source. Can’t recall right now. Mistral 4 Large and Kolibri 1 are interesting open-weight models. Lots to come.

    I also think that making the technology your own is the best way to tackle the big American corps and their proprietary models.