Without whois info them ever going bankrupt risks losing domains as you couldn’t ask the NIC for the TLD to give you back access with a new registrar, sounds sketchy.

Letsencrypt is fine, but keep in mind that US sanctions could destroy it anytime. Even their rules state that their not allowed to cooperate with individuals or organisations sanctioned by the US.

It’s time to look for European alternatives there as well.

Yup, it’s also brought us more rights and you can freely travel and move to other places. :D

I’d only like to at least suggest source available.

Perhaps you could also offer support for on-prem setups at a higher cost.

I strongly prefer products where I can at least look at the source, even if I may not offer them myself.

The goal isn’t cheap labour, but to get living stamdards on the same level, slowly, over time.

Then it’d just be an ad. -.-

Sure, but I don’t want “GitHub, but in the EU”, as the post suggests.

Nothing here mentions federated forges. I agreee it’d be nice for those that don’t want to selfhost, but we need to ensure there’ll be more decentralisation in the future.

Just look at how Autistici/Inventati got shut down because one mad person on the other side of the world decided he didn’t like them. Good luck shutting down much more decentralised infrastructure. And this will only become more important, not less.

Well, basically in the same way as with the fediverse, email, XMPP, SSH and every other service on the internet.

You look at what you receive and don’t simply trust what is sent to you.

Looks similar to Super Productivity, but cleaner UI.

Where’s the source? I’d like to set it up for myself at home, perhaps I can contribute some small improvements as well.

No, I’d rather use ForgeFed and have it all decebtralised, like Git is meant to be.

EU membership surely would come have with minority rights, so I don’t see the point in blocking.

It’s not a good tool for research, it will just generate a hallucination and you end up doing something which does not work or just works somehow, but is not done correctly and will break in the future.

I talked to quite a few people recently at the postmarketOS and Alpine Linux conference, it definitely was noticed that more contributions are now coming in that do things wrong or in a subtly broken way and the submitting people have no clue.

If you rely on a lying computer for research, then your code will lie to you.

If you order from another place you’d be importing.

If, for example, you order something from China to somewhere in the European customs union, directly from China and not a European company, you’d be the importer and as such are responsible for following your country’s regulations.

Imagine being a seller and someone from another country, perhaps one you don’t know much about and one that is not in a customs union with the country you are in, orders something from you. There’s no reason you would have to comply with regulations of that country.

Well, we know the best practices for the Nura project:

We forbid the use of generative AI tools in Nura.

It’s literally the first sentence of their policy.

since it’s better at reverse engineering and bug hunting than developing when compared to a human

Citation needed.

“AI” can also speed up the process of making a code base buggy and hard to debug, when the people that generated it do not understand the code.

Nura will not accept generated patches, by the way. It might run your own version of Nura, but will not run upstream Nura with your patches.