That’s not really my point, but for what it’s worth I don’t mind if I was paying for something and it allowed you to use it because you can’t afford it.
Nothing in life is free, someone’s paying for it. If I use a service, I think it’s fair for me to pay a fair price.
This attitude is why the internet is full of ads. Doing shit for free doesn’t happen on an empty stomach. I’d rather pay a fair price for software and services I use. I’m not saying anyone’s pricing is fair, just pointing out I don’t agree with this behavior.
18 months, someone had to have figured it out before this week. Be careful if you thought your VPN was good.
I mean, there’s also the idea that no matter what, the runway is limited. We’ve consumed all the human corpus to make the current models, we can’t outrun the current content generation.
Doom guy reference?
Why you would even do this is beyond me.
Haha it’s funny to see it out loud.
That’s not really how it works. Instead it’s more, the browser gets to ask the kernel to use your GPU and download assets. Your browser is a VM and the kernel is a hypervisor to it, if that makes sense.
The slot machine companies say the slot machines are getting way too good, but too good to release. They say people should keep using the machines but they should slow down development, so that they can release slots that won’t be as good but will be “safe”. All the slot companies agree at the same time, and definitely wouldn’t release the best slot machine if it weren’t so dangerous.
Sounds like we’re in agreement, great. Not everything can have that scheme but I support things as best I can, again as long as it’s fair. Affordability is different for everyone.