klankin

Thats really cool.

Is there any reason you chose grafana over home assistant?

I’m just setting uo a similar system myself, but I never even had the idea to use grafana for it

Could also be the amount of processing time strings take.

I’m sure you could fit 150GB of uncompressed assets on a CD though right?

You got me there not gonna lie.

I think I have a hard time seeing technological/ethical/philosphical as new cause most of it is just a change in order of magnitude over old mathematical/ethical/philosophical debates, but that is my own bias. Honestly I feel like comparing AI models is closer to that stupid Nazi “skull measuring” bs than a generalisable framework for the universe.

On the medical ethical side, I’d trust a computer to make decisions that require that processing order of magnitude (or sampling frequency/sampling method) - but again I feel like we were already accepting this back in the 40s with early digital sensors, and even more so in the 90s on with microchips.

But I wouldn’t trust them on emotional decisions and interpretation, cause why try to approximate some then when real humans exist.

So TLDR my hot take is Drs have for a while been human machine translator/therapists, which ends up being a pretty damn technical job.

It is by definition a drop in the ocean, so I can understand why someone would find it insignificant, but

I find it kinda cool cause odds are no one else is that autistic, so it has potential go be nearly a single-user fingerprint on LLM outputs. Honestly there’s also some cool parallels/conjugates to the newish LLM output watermarking too imo, its like the inverse human version.

Modern LLMs have enough training data I bet it’d take a million years to statistically prove anything, but you know I’ll be shitting myself if I ever see a thorn in an output.

Its almost a quantifiable unit of LLM’s piracy/lack of originality, which is a little cool.

You genuinely think there’s more musk’s than dolly partons in the world?

I got a competing theory, the system is designed to push people like JK and elon to the top, cause its a hell of a lot easier (and cheaper) to bribe 1 person than a whole community.

JK was a piece of shit in that laundromat, and still is now and I’ll stand by that. (That being said I’m the type of person to argue with a trans phone in a McDonalds for an unreasonable amount of time, so I’m probably a little dunning-kruger on the topic)

deleted by creator

Sorry I might have worded that weirdly, but I agree.

I meant the AI market is speculative, and at the cost of an existing market of customers goodwill (who are only quite profitable), nvidia bought some speculative tech bros goodwill (who are currently incredibly profitable).

Its certainly one of the business decisions of all time.

Awe but we support supplied oxygen PPE here

Yeah but in a post about LLMs I think the context clues kinda enforce what AI algorithm is being discussed.

I suppose it is only mentioned in the edit of OP, but still

I heard a story once from the midevil times where they changed the law from “hanged” to “hanged until death” cause they had to let someone off after a botched hanging.

Not too much precedent since then though cause most civilised countries have since banned state murder.

I vote we should start flipping a coin for all decisions ever, to take the emotional pressure off everyone and blame the coin.

Cause I stg I’d kill god himself before we treat healthcare workers like humans, the only reasonable solution is the coin.

You think that can be accurately encoded in a text predictor?

Like sure eventually computers will be powerful enough to Turing machine an LLM into something useful - a la monkeys on typewriters. But the efficiency of such a system is compatible to natural selection in its probability distribution. When a Dr 40 years ago could have given you the same, and actually describe why without taking another 2^256 years to compute.

I think we started that a few decades ago with credit score?

Like we don’t directly kill anyone I suppose, but definitely indirectly increase the odds when they are less helpful monetarily.

Just for example with the gen Z suicide epidemic, by definition people are killing themselves not being killed. But to a company this is financially beneficial, cause a left-wing bias has on average resulted in more restrictive laws and a lower profit margin. It becomes an important business strategy to ensure they remain poor and anxious (and of course this causes some to be suicidal). Vice versa for boomers of course, elder care has never been better funded across human history.

Or another example, credit score companies would be “throwing money away” if they weren’t also doing this for like union-oriented families, ie ensuring those who have statistically unionised (or follow any trends that might be too union-y), they’re marked less valuable.

So they can kill people by letting them starve/OD/get in a car accident, or just shorten their lifespan with cheap housing, all without ever having to see a poor person.

Thats really funny that your way for an AI to solve a problem is have something else solve the problem then claim ownership.

Like would it not be simpler in almost all cases to just use the tool directly?

Otherwise youre introducing an intentionally difficult to quantify number of errors.

I think thats OPs point, Ai doesn’t provide answers, it provides confidence.

So when they get it wrong 99% of the time, it doesn’t actually matter cause we decided pleasing stakeholders is equivalent to actual success.

Hell yeah I can be technically correct.

Under some definitions of intelligence, any transformation of information is intelligence, for example even 1+1=2.

So my math super ultra premium vbux AI discovery is the following python script:

print("2")

As per all test cases I’ve been able to conceive, this model has achieved a 100% success rate - and is definitively a major stepping stone to AGI (Is it now legally SGI in america?).

I’ll expect my trillion in the mail.

My favourite dystopian theories are always the ones it turns out america has already been doing for 150 years.

Like the torment nexus ain’t just inspirational, its systemically foundational.

Edit: Lmao someone else was creating credit score from first principals below

For nvidias stock price maybe, but youre time is better spend looking for faries and elves tbh

I think it just caught them by surprise with how little value they actually provide.

They clearly expected open weight models to lag behind a couple years for at least a couple more years - but cause all their entire company dos is clicking start on a python programming, its pretty trivially FOSS-able.