

I think you have a good point, younger people will enjoy more games with better QoL than old games and of course mechanics and graphics, the last one in particular because people tend to confuse good graphics and good games
But still, Nintendo keeps playing over and over with the same exact titles, they know Zelda sells, and they know specifically Ocarina sells, then they keep selling you the same game, with new graphics.
Take Monster Hunter for instance, Capcom instead of recreating the same Monster Hunter 2000 times, they just create a new game with new things, because Monster Hunter don’t have a “always seller title that we can sell you eternally” like Ocarina, so they keep forward
And don’t get me wrong, Ocarina is a great game, and Nintendo isn’t stupid, they know the math, but let’s think this: Aren’t they (the company, in this case Nintendo) the ones who are forcing you to NOT TO PLAY their own games? If you try to emulate they sue you, they don’t care if you owned the game or not, why is so hard to almost every company to simply have an compability layer (when they developed this machines, and backwards compability isn’t something new) with older consoles, so you simply go to the eShop and pay for the old Ocarina? Because they think that if they do that, they can’t sell you their new remaster.


Why does it feel so “wrong” to play AI decompilated ports? I guess because people doesn’t actually do anything but ask an LLM to do everything and they just release it like they did something amazing?
I don’t care when using AI with the Linux kernel because we know that Linus has been developing the kernel for years, so we can guess we know what he is doing, but honestly I prefer to play an emulated version of PT using ShadPS4 than using this decompilated version
Edit: According to the article the developer didn’t use AI to decompile PT and port it to PC, but actually port it with new features, I guess in this case is “fair use” if he know what he’s doing, but you get my point, with games like Bloodborne or GOW.