• 0 Posts
  • 43 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • Although the jury concluded that Meta had over 43 million violations of the state’s unfair practices act, with each transgression carrying a civil penalty as high as $5,000, a New Mexico judge was responsible for determining the ultimate fine. The Wednesday filing showed that the state was awarded $219.5 billion, but the penalty was ultimately reduced to $25 billion.

    So the $25 billion judgment is a judicial reduction from the jury award of $219.5 billion.

    I also like this decision from the judge:

    The judge added that interest on the penalty shall accrue at the rate of 15% each year until the fine is paid off in full.

    Meta will likely appeal, but not only does that not guarantee a reduction in the judgment, if they drag this out for years, New Mexico gets paid out even more.







  • and then I have electric radiators to make only the areas I am using comfortable.

    While electric radiators are 100% electricity efficient (meaning 100% of the electrical energy turns into heat), they are very far away from an economical way to create heat. I understand the cost of a central heat pump can be expensive. If you’ve already modeled your heat use around specific smaller spaces to heat to comfort level, you may benefit from a small window mounted heat pump that costs $340.. The one I linked here shows a power consumption of 800 Watts (on a better site). If you’re in the USA, your electric resistive heaters are likely drawing 1500w.

    Here’s how that would translate to energy consumption costs (assumptions: you pay 25 cents per KWh of electricity):

    • Electric resistive heater running full blast (5,118 BTUs per hour) for 24 hours: 36KWh x .25 cents = $9 in electricity cost per day to produce 122,832 BTUs in a day
    • Window heat pump running full blast for 24 hours: 19.2KWh x .25 cents = $4.8 in electricity cost per day to produce 192,000 BTUs in a day

    So this unit would cost just about half the electricity to run, and produce 36% more heat! Obviously neither heater would be running full blast for 24 hours, and the heating efficiency will vary depending on how cold it gets outside, but the savings would likely still be substantial. You might even be able to run the window heat pumps longer and use less natural gas. More expensive than a window unit, but still far cheaper than a central heat pump would be a mini-split. These are usually even slightly more efficient and far cheaper than central heat pumps.

    Considering you’ve already got a PV solar setup, your solar power would go significantly farther in reducing your monthly energy bills.







  • We’re probably talking about slightly different aspects of the same thing.

    Emergencies are handled by pulling peope that are off duty

    There are different levels of emergencies, right? So there is likely Y number of officers that have to be on duty at all times, and an additional X officers that number officers need to be employed by the department yes to respond to the highest levels of emergency to be able to pull people in when they are off duty.

    firefighters (volunteer and professional), and first-responsders from the surrounding area.

    For this discussion, I was assuming we’re only talking about police response needed. When I say “police needed to respond to emergencies” I’m only talking about the police component, not the other type of first responders. I don’t see how its useful to expand the conversation to other first responders when we’re only talking about employed police officers. If you have information about how the number of firefighters/EMTs can increase or decrease the number of police officers employed for policing, I’m open to consider that argument or something similar.

    Cutting the police budget is notoriously difficult for political reasons.

    I agree with this.


  • Why does everyone drive 10-15 miles above the speed limit?

    Because speed limits are not strictly enforced

    Why don’t we raise the speed limit if that’s how fast everyone wants to go?

    Because if that happens that any per-textual stop the police want to do needs an another actual crime being committed before they can stop you.

    Why is traffic enforcement given to very expensive and ineffective police instead of cheaper and more automated traffic cameras?

    I reject the premise. Traffic enforcement isn’t very ineffective because the majority of people aren’t driving 50+ MPH over the speed limit. Also, its not that expensive because your premise suggests that if we had cameras, we’d need fewer police. I don’t think that’s the case. When an emergency response is needed we need X number of police to respond. Therefore X number need to be employed and on shift at all times. If we have the expense of traffic cameras, its not going to reduce headcount below X, and we now have the additional expense of purchase, install, and maintenance of all those traffic cameras. The cameras have an headcount overhead of staff of their own.

    Traffic cameras also introduce mistakes of their own including misreading plates, or thieves using stolen/copied plates, which would otherwise ensnare innocent citizens.

    It’s a serious confusion I have about how society is supposed to operate because it seems like a complete and total breakdown of logic and sense.

    I think you’re looking at the rules and assuming the logical outcome is the desired result. Change your mindset. The desired result is what happens when human society is given a set of rules and reacts to them. The reaction is the actual desired result. The set of rules is simply one step to get there. In short, humans aren’t 100% logical nor are they 100% rule following, knowing that, you establish a set of rules that you know will have some violation and you account for that in rules.




  • My solar PV system was one the reasons I went ahead and ripped out the gas furnace and put in a cold climate heat pump. No amount of solar generation lowered the gas bill, but with the heat pump that is yet another bill that is paid for largely by the panels on the roof. The continued rising costs of gas was another incentive to remove the low efficiency contractor grade gas furnace. In the USA we were also able to take advantage of the tax credit to pay for part of the heat pump installation before trump did away with the credit.

    Can I ask what fuel you’re using to heat your house now? Also do you have AC for cooling in your house already?



  • Getty shares have lost about 99% of their value since returning to public markets in 2022 through a special purpose acquisition company that valued ⁠the ​company at about $4.8 billion, after 14 years ​as a private firm.

    A SPAC strikes again!

    It makes me curious how the financials could go so wrong for Getty. What are their operating expenses? Certainly fixed costs for the infrastructure for maintaining and distributing images and video, but with the royalties they charge I would imagine that is a tiny cost. I would also guess human staff needed for negotiating larger licensing/content deals would also exist. Even with these two expenses licensing images, I would think, would be very profitable.

    The article mentioned bond holders, so they’re clearly carrying debt. I wonder if that was just for the attempted Shutterstock acquisition or if they’ve been borrowing to maintain operations for years and the worldwide credit crunch just caught up with them.