I also wish debian GNU/kfreeBSD was still a thing.
provectus
- 1 Post
- 11 Comments
I just think a majority of people do not care about which OS they use, or even know what is an OS. The only way for GNU/Linux to become big is if companies start shipping it in computers instead of windows.
OSX also came from NextStep which came from the original BSD Unix. They used FreeBSD as well. OSX is also certified Unix starting from leopard. This year apple did not renew the certification, so later releases of macOS are not Unix, but Unix-like.
Linux is the second-most popular descendent of Unix, the first being OSX.
Linux is not really a descendant of Unix. It is a Unix clone, but its roots do not trace back to Unix.
provectus@lemmy.mlto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•I will confess that I have obsessively watched merge requests on a daily basisEnglish
1·12 天前If we are talking gnome that will never happen. Sorry.
provectus@lemmy.mlto
Linux@lemmy.ml•AI disclosure is no longer required for the Linux KernelEnglish
113·15 天前NetBSD has a clear stance on no ai.
Yeah, I am worried that we are becoming too dependent on Linux(kernel) and systemd. I think it would be very hard to maintain a fork of Linux and systemd because their codebases are very large, and develop at a really fast pace (ai will make this even worse).
Of course these are my opinions, but I wonder if anyone shares them as well besides me.
From what I understand from the article is that public domain’s legality can be questioned (especially in germany), therefore they conclude that it is not opensource, similar to how releasing software with no license is not OSS. That is where licenses like in the article CC0 come in play and unlicense to help create legal public-domain-like software.
In templeOS case
TempleOS is 100% open source with all source present.
From https://github.com/cia-foundation/TempleOS/blob/archive/ReadMe.TXT
templeos is public domain, which is incompatible with open source
Where did you come up with that conclusion?
Public domain just means you waive your copyrights. Unlicense is a license that helps you get your piece of software into public domain and is OSI approved. I prefer public domain over permissive licenses because it is easier to release a gpl version of them over permissive licenses (public domain does not have any restrictions). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-domain_software


Do you know about the linux-compat layer on FreeBSD? https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/linuxemu/