

Unfortunately most will read it as “if I vote for her, no more money goes there and I get more of it”.
European guy, weird by default.
You dislike what I say, great. Makes the world a more interesting of a place. But try to disagree with me beyond a downvote. Argue your point. Let’s see if we can reach a consensus between our positions.


Unfortunately most will read it as “if I vote for her, no more money goes there and I get more of it”.


I’m going to get nightmares.


Where is this?
I’ve worked in office space with computers, handling sensible data, and there wasn’t an anti-virus solution. Ever.


I am at a loss of words for how non-sensical this is.


I did a similar question once and got my answer delivered through a book I was reading then: fantasy knows no bounds.
Many technological breakthroughs and discoveries were made because someone decided they wanted to test if some weird or outlandish concept a writer put in a novel or a television series actually holds up to the real world.
And regarding discussing super heroes fighting each other, it is a good way to plot ideas and concepts. It’s a mental exercise. In similar way to philosophy or religion.


That is not surprising.
It didn’t brutalize me if only to make me think. Others that I’ve presented to his work found it crass and out of place. He was a very inteligent man.
I’ve been hearing his shows for more than ten years. Served as a brutal eye opener when one day I realized the true jokes weren’t from the man’s mouth but was sitting in the audience. And I’m not even american.
Enjoy.
It’s a quote on George Carlin.
His shows are on Youtube. You’ll enjoy it. But be prepared to be brutalized on your sensitivities.
I am not a cat person. That given: silly or invoking Cthulhu?


Their aiming is failing them. Fruit of the years. The older generations have that ingrained mindset that peeing is done standing, while younger people just reached the conclusion sitting down is cleaner and much more comfortable.
Yes, thank you. Someone with a grasp on how punishment for the sake of it works. Or not.


Maintaing the figure in power won’t solve anything either.


Who cares about what happens after? The problem is the now.
Just to use your analogy, why do you consider the capability to create “maps” of given a “territory” a weakness?
It is quite useful to be able to draw a “map” or theory upon a “territory” or field of knowledge, to be later tested.


Porque no los tres?
Russia, Ukraine and US head figures all look a bit worse for wear.
I read the Wikipedia article and I have a vague recolection of a thread here where the woman early years and life was described and this is a seriously abused individual.
Did she nonetheless took part in a heinous murder? Yes.
Is capital punishment a fitting sentence? No.
And I don’t care whatever reasoning is put here; capital punishment is not a sentence to be delivered. Someone needs to become a killer to execute another and someone needs to deal with that notion to the end of their life.
If the woman is deemed dangerous to be set in society, commit her to an insane asylum. Give her a garden to tend, use her life and behaviour as a case study, learn something from it, cremate her corpse and spread her ashes after she dies of old age so no cult can sprout from her grave site.
And commit the entire case for the history books.
Throw him in a small confined space, turn off the lights and set the snakes free.