Yup, it’s always like this. Stop mass producing environmental harmful products and we’ll talk about civil responsibility on sustainability.
CarrotsHaveEars
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
Cake day: October 3rd, 2021
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Are you implying the act of rape?
42·4 days agoChromium is open source. Google is evil.
“Fork it, grandpa!”
21·4 days agoJust move to NetBSD already. I guarantee you that Linux will become shit in a year. The best outcome could be the core team abandoning Torvals and forking it under a new name.
OMG, yes! Why didn’t I think of that before!? I’m gonna be a psychology doctor and rename all my hallucinating patients as “Claude” and BAM! They become genius now!
He might be a genius in the past. He has always been arrogant. Now he’s just stupid and arrogant.
Dude, what you give LLM is not instructions. It doesn’t follow your instructions. It brings you back what might look like you want.
A CPU, on the other hand, carries out the instructions exactly like you’ve said.
There is no way to avoid incorrect answers from LLM. It’s probablistic; there is always a chance of getting a wrong answer no matter how you improve it. With a CPU, you can reduce errors by improving the design. It’s based on physics; it’s logical.
I advice you to stop treating LLMs as blackboxes and only observe it from the outside. You’ll never notice the difference if the error rate is low enough.
11·10 days agoThere is still a distinction between bad human-written source code and AI slop.
The human holds the copyright of his work and can do whatever he wants with it, including distributing it under a open/libre license, i.e., open source.
AI slop? Not so much. The model is very likely trained on stolen work. It’s tainted. Nobody owns the copyright of everything it generates. No one can “open source” it. The license every one receives is voided.
And both who (intentionally) releases bad code to the crowd lack the spirit of open source, but the AI one is also right out illegal.
Perhaps that’s the problem. If it’s bad, I can still tell and choose not to read it. If it seems to make sense but actually not, I’m just going to waste my valueab time.
It is now called ”Done".
Link to the official website, will you?
https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/10/09/tdf-visual-identity/
Excuse me, do you call this open source?
For real. I can open source my valueable projects to you. But what if I deliberately make it hard to read, like mangling it or minifying it?
Hell, every piece of JavaScript code on Earth is technically open source. If you can read assembly, everything is open source.
Only having the source code distributed is not open source in spirit. The intention of opening the source code is welcoming auditing, learning, contributing, to name a few.
“Opening” the source code of slop, with tons of meaningless boilerplates, non-logical paths and flows, heavily coupled modules and functions, thousand-line long functions, achieves none of the purpose of the intention.
Any of you seeing the text too small and distorted?