• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 8th, 2026

help-circle

  • I’m no dream interpreter, just a gal that sleeps and dreams a lot (narcolepsy), so I’ll give it a shot to humor myself (and maybe you?). I think your unconscious self might be feeling exposed about something and is insecure about whether other people would tell you or let you keep cluelessly embarrassing yourself. It could be figurative, a situation you’ve been dealing with, or literal, your butt isn’t under the blanket and feeling a light breeze.


  • searabbit@piefed.socialtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.world•Anti-progressism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Half of the country doesn’t go to college, many because they can’t afford to, and forgiving this batch of student loan debt doesn’t fix the problem or hand down consequences to the universities that see students as a cash grab rather than the next generation to educate. It’s just a terrible short sighted solution that only helps a fraction of people and angers an even larger fraction of people. A more pragmatic short term solution is to let the recipients be able to declare bankruptcy and be done with it, but that’s going to be even less popular because then everyone involved deals with their share of the consequences. Everyone would rather get “free” money.







  • That was one of my gripes with my experience in college vs hs. In my hs at least, we were taught the most difficult combination of a problem and then everything that we practiced would be able to be worked out from there. In college, we were often taught the simplest example and somehow expected to derive the most difficult version of it on the problem sets. That’s how you get students who study really hard for an exam and half of them fail. They never taught the proper way to solve the problem!

    I was out of college by the time LLMs came out but I still believe they could be helpful in this scenario if fine tuned and limited as a tutor not an answer-giver. Obviously if you have access to a good human tutor (who doesn’t call you dumb like my friend had at the time), but I didn’t have access to one.




  • This feels like the poison scene from the princess bride, so I’ll approach it with that level of intellectual derangement.

    Which means the obvious first step is to recognize that the house is a cheater who wants you to stay poor so your choice doesn’t matter. There is poison in both cups and I will lose either way. Money no longer influences my decision.

    Next, I flip a coin ten times and note my reaction to the choices. That’s my gut instinct and obviously what the model predicted unless it’s either not smart enough to know my gut or smart enough to predict my double bluff, therefore useless.

    Next, I decide which variables are most likely to influence the prediction (gender, age, education level, big 5 personality score) and realize this is the adult marshmallow test. I obviously think I’m smart and want the model to know that, so it obviously predicted that I would take one box because I’m a good little goodie two shoes who delays instant gratification for the potential bigger payoff. Therefore I choose two boxes because the model would never expect someone as smart as I to make such a dumb greedy move. Surely, I have outsmarted the supercomputer with my quadruple bluff and have won.

    And then I remember I am dumb and the model knows that, because in my excitement, I forgot that the house is a cheater who always wins (and there was likely never any money in the mystery box because researchers never get that kind of funding). I am forced to believe that the model accurately perceived me to be a greedy idiot who took two boxes against my better judgement, shattering my ego.

    But hey, I at least got $1k out of it.