• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle
  • Why does everyone seem to assume no violence means no consequences. I don’t think a player who calls someone a whore should be allowed back on the rink. Just remove the bully. It’s a natural consequence (“we don’t want abuse so if you do that you cant be here”) that I assure you will be more effective than punching them in the face. And it doesn’t require a vigilante justice that risks escalating the situation. That slope is too slippery.



  • tias@discuss.tchncs.detoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Game misconduct
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Game theory says no such thing.

    More in line with actual (but barely relevant) game theory results: In repeated interactions, strategies that respond to bad behavior in proportion, then quickly forgive, tend to do well, and being a bit more forgiving than strict tit-for-tat helps when misunderstandings happen.

    The key here is in proportion, and you said it yourself: “while simultaneously not going too far”. Responding with physical violence to a verbal attack is disproportionate and it’s going too far.







  • Fun fact: most implementations actually always use 65537 as the public RSA key (17 was more common earlier, but rare now). It makes computations easier and faster, and doesn’t affect security much as long as you pick a hard-to-guess private key. The modulus is the thing that varies in public certificates.