That sounds nice. Now implement it like this…

User enters username and password then enters the Prompt.
The Prompt gets generated into a request form.
In the form, then the user fills the reasoning behind the prompt and attaches the required documentation and sends the request document to the Court.
This document gets archived for eternity and also reaches the Court along with the full history of the user.
The Court assigns the request to those that process warrants. After processing, if the request is accepted, then it goes to a judge that checks it and gives its digital signature, to create an acceptance token.
This token then goes back to the user’s system which then causes the Prompt to be passed to the AI interface.

The same for all follow-up prompts.

Yeah, the user didn’t give a time limit.
They could have just run it slow.

It’s easy if you trained the model on the disassembled Skyrim binary.

Yeah this stuff is rage bait

There are some people out there that have the power to create policies but also for some reason want to do good for people in general. Except that they don’t understand tech. This is to bait them into becoming “for AI”.

Also, to help others make excuses for adding AI.

They are made to look like steel, because good quality steel is expensive as compared to the materials they use in it.

The flooring?
IDK what that BS is. I’d rather have granite, which is again, a luxury because it is hard to machine.

I guess some people would be happy to show how their space-ful codebases have higher gzip compression ratio than tabbed ones.

Tabs are the cheaper alternative.

-1 ∵ Those were spaces you put there.

You thought you could fool me?

Didn’t add PayPal and their fake security verification?

Considering how I end up saying worse, when I get 100+ line changes of code with a commit message that only illustrates 1 of the changes, I don’t think I care about anyone being “adjusted”.