I do about a monthly update of my Debian machines. Today I did the usual monthly update and noticed loads of packages uploading from the “security” branch. I’ve had the impression (just an impression) that more and more packages are being updated from security over the past many months. Trixie has been out for a while now and I would have thought that less and less updates should be coming from security. Has anyone had this sensation and if so has anyone linked this to AI finding more holes in OSS that would have normally been found by human scrutiny? Has there been any official research into this? And if this is true, does it mean that we have been running insecure software all along? Or is there is there a risk that AI start filing patches that actually make it less secure because software maintainers are not being rigorous in verifying who is submitting the patch? AI must be changing the paradigm of software development more than any other area of our lives and I can’t still work out if in a better way or not.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Have we been running insecure software since the arrival of AI?

    No, “AI” doesn’t exist and software has been insecure since it was invented.

    Has anyone had this sensation and if so has anyone linked this to AI finding more holes in OSS that would have normally been found by human scrutiny?

    A major point of automated security checks is that humans didn’t find these vulnerabilities and might never have found them without computational aids.

    does it mean that we have been running insecure software all along?

    Yes, 10000%. Security is a complete illusion even with automated checks. If an organization has enough time and money (eg. state surveillance), they will hack whatever they want to hack.