AI being the future of literally everything as a modern snake oil is really attractive to stupid people. They feel like they are missing out if it isn’t crammed into everything.
I bit the bullet and clicked through. The article cut off, but the headline seems a little misleading. They didn’t reject a finished game because it didn’t have enough slop. The devs said it wasn’t ready and they were told to ramp up AI use because people think more AI means faster turnaround.
Someone who has access to the full article can correct me if I am wrong.
But why?
AI being the future of literally everything as a modern snake oil is really attractive to stupid people. They feel like they are missing out if it isn’t crammed into everything.
In the 90s it was all “How do we focus on our core competencies?”
I bit the bullet and clicked through. The article cut off, but the headline seems a little misleading. They didn’t reject a finished game because it didn’t have enough slop. The devs said it wasn’t ready and they were told to ramp up AI use because people think more AI means faster turnaround.
Someone who has access to the full article can correct me if I am wrong.
That makes much more sense. Now with that in mind, the title doesn’t sound wrong anymore.
Just wait a day, until Ai bots rewrite the story in new articles. This is how we get fed nowadays.