Jane Doe’s sworn statement in November of 2024 did not allege that she was drugged against her will or gang raped. On the contrary, Jane Doe’s statement described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual.
…
The View’s Sunny Hostin, a former federal prosecutor specializing in child sex crimes, said “she read the Jane Doe’s original nine-page 2024 statement” and “there is no way, according to her statement in 2024, that any prosecutor would have brought the case.”
The man started by apologizing for “how things went down.” He said his memory is “kinda fuzzy,” and that he and another man feel bad for being too intoxicated to “shut it down and kick people out before it got way out of hand.”
The woman in the text chain replied that her memory is “super clouded too,” and said they had all been heavily intoxicated.
She also wrote, “non(e) of the sexual stuff was illegal.” She said she liked being with him and another man. Later, she suggested they smoke together again, “but like leave out the extra 5 billion men and ketamine.”
I feel like you have not read the actual narrative. You’re just ignoring all of the evidence that shows a lack of consent. And I won’t explain it here, because there’s so much solid reporting already available to you, or anyone who might have a similar view.
I read the evidence available to the public and formed my own opinion. She regretted it after other women started slut shaming her.
She was planning to go party at the same frat house, with the same people, to use the same drugs, to get a smaller train run on her and ONLY after her invite was withdrawn did she decide to go crying about events.
…
How odd
It’s already been revealed that Cornell purposefully held back evidence from the DA. Keep up.
Believe all women
You’re not being as clever as you think you are.
Thanks, I understand it’s normal to start planning to hang out with your gang rapists ASAP
Fawning is a pretty normal trauma response along with freeze, fight, and flight.
Managed to get yourself banned from the Europe community for being a nazi, eh?
Oh yeah apparently being anti-slavery is nazi behaviour
Mhm.
Keep it topical. There are other places for this.
If you’re so keen to look at my profile go check for yourself
Unless facts really don’t matter in your narrative. There’s no way that’s possible right? Right?
It literally is
lol I wonder what it’s like living in this fantasy world of yours
You too can experience it, by doing research instead of basing your worldview on vibes.
It’s a lot less comfortable.
Oh research now! Please be my guest, show me some research indicating that gang rape victims often immediately try to organise a round 2
I feel like you have not read the actual narrative. You’re just ignoring all of the evidence that shows a lack of consent. And I won’t explain it here, because there’s so much solid reporting already available to you, or anyone who might have a similar view.
Go read it. Do your homework. Meh.
I read the evidence available to the public and formed my own opinion. She regretted it after other women started slut shaming her.
She was planning to go party at the same frat house, with the same people, to use the same drugs, to get a smaller train run on her and ONLY after her invite was withdrawn did she decide to go crying about events.
I want you to know that you’re a real piece of shit
You will die alone and lonely
lol
Its ok. They consented to some kinky stuff, relating to cutting off oxygen to their balls.
And if they fall off, its just a known risk they consented to.