May also means may not
We can rewrite the title as
Glp1s may not slow biological aging
However, the study found compared to the placebo group:
-
Participants treated with semaglutide exhibited a broad pattern of slower biological aging across epigenetic clocks linked to inflammation and blood, brain, heart, kidney, liver and metabolic health.
-
The drug slowed the pace of biological aging by 9 %, as measured by the DunedinPACE epigenetic clock.
-
The drug significantly slowed biological processes associated with the risk of all‑cause mortality and age-related disease, as measured by the PCGrimAgeepigenetic clock.
It’s just that the study focused on people with a particular condition so it takes more studies to know if it affects the general population similarly.
are these unique to the glp-1 intervention or are they echos of ketone production, fat metabolism, increased insulin sensitivity… are there more effective ways to achieve the same marker improvements without using a glp-1? (obviously yes)
Making casual claims like slow biological aging requires the context which the data is based, and a demonstration of the mechanisms.
-
Dayum, but I’m already scrawny ☹️
I feel like it makes people look gaunt. Also risk for literally “loss of optic nerve”.



