German compound nouns are just written without spaces. There’s no grammatical difference between “Schlafsack” (= Schlaf “sleep” + Sack “bag”) and “sleeping bag”, except the way they’re written down. In English we analyse a “word” as “a thing you write down with spaces on either side”, which is valid as a definition or as an analysis, but it’s not what we really think of when we talk about words, which we think of as something more fundamental.
If, tomorrow, we decided in English to write compound nouns without spaces, the language would have suddenly gained thousands and thousands of words, yet the only real difference would be a rule about writing things down. Spoken English would be exactly the same, so nothing fundamental about the actual bits of English would have changed.
German compound nouns are just written without spaces. There’s no grammatical difference between “Schlafsack” (= Schlaf “sleep” + Sack “bag”) and “sleeping bag”, except the way they’re written down. In English we analyse a “word” as “a thing you write down with spaces on either side”, which is valid as a definition or as an analysis, but it’s not what we really think of when we talk about words, which we think of as something more fundamental.
If, tomorrow, we decided in English to write compound nouns without spaces, the language would have suddenly gained thousands and thousands of words, yet the only real difference would be a rule about writing things down. Spoken English would be exactly the same, so nothing fundamental about the actual bits of English would have changed.
One of my frustrations with English is that spaces in compound nouns are arbitrary. We have fishbowl but also fish tank.
Well the rest of the rules around written English are arbitrary, why would this one be different?!
I think I’d write fish bowl separately though.
Depends if it’s a fish bowl (a bowl for a fish) or a fishbowl (a big watered down drink you can buy from bad nightclubs)
What would you call this?
delightful?
Username checks out