Gets called by demeanitive and vulgar slur once by a insolvent gaslighting middle east bombing pedophile rapist pariah co-conspirator.
Instantly takes the blame on a harmless and substantial group of people with their own selective mutism and freedom of speech.
I think this is a fallacy: as emphatically as state voters may support anti-trans messaging on a symbolic/narrative level, that doesn’t necessarily translate to support for specific policies. What they care about more than policy is a narrative of strength, and Andrews’ mealy-mouthed denials convey weakness instead.
I think trans people would be a hundred percent better off with Andrews as a senator over any republican.
She’s made it clear she’d genocide them if it benefited her. $10 says she makes the rotating villain list even if she gets elected.
Does that make her still better than her opponent?
Probably. Personally I’m just glad she’s not on my ticket.
Where?
When she supported genocidal rhetoric because she thought it benefited her. Keep up.
Edit: wonder what little baby bitch just spam down voted, hmmm.
But you said she made it clear she would genocide trans people.
If it benefited her, yes. What’s your malfunction?