• GardenGeek@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      They can do that. But it would also be difficult for the Navy to provide logistical support for its operations if the entire region, plus Europe, decided to shut down the U.S. bases. It would be possible, of course, but it would involve significantly more effort and cost… After all, the ability to supply troops around the globe is precisely the reason for the U.S. bases all over the world, if I understand correctly.

      • panthera_@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You make a good point, but all these countries would have to agree. It would be simpler for Europe, China, and Russia to get together and negotiate with Iran. They have the power to implement any agreement even if the US rejects it.

    • VAK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes, I suppose that’s true. This would have to be dressed as a big win for Trump.

      • panthera_@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s why I said Europe, China, and Russia should get together and negotiate with Iran. They have the power to implement any deal even if the US rejects it.

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Can you think of any deal those 3 could make that would be beneficial to all 3 parties over the current status quo? You can ignore political feasibility

          I certainly cannot, and in most situations political feasibility is the largest impediment

          • panthera_@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I think a big obstacle is Trumping wanting Iran to give its enriched uranium to the US for storage. Europe, China, and Russia would be open to it being stored in their countries or Pakistan. Iran trusts these 3 countries more. Also, China and Russia are allies of Iran and can pressure it into an agreement.

        • VAK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          None of them would be interested in being so “hands-on” in Persian gulf. Maybe the new Pakistan Saudi Turkey alliance could step in but its hard to make a case for them to work against US actions.

          • panthera_@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Are Russia and China willing to risk the Iranian regime collapsing and being replaced by a pro-US government? Does Europe want Trump to help Putin because he wants Russian diesel oil?

            • VAK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Russia and China are smart enough to know that a pro US government in Iran is impossible. Europe defending against US aggression will be, again, impossible.

              • panthera_@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I don’t think the US and Israel agree. I believe they attacked Iran because they thought the people would rebel and a regime favorable to the US would be installed. Trump still hopes that the blockade will lead to the collapse of the Iranian regime. Europe with China and Russia can implement an agreement with Iran.