how do you define and separate ‘good’ from ‘bad’ art, though?

It’s partly subjective. Think the quality of the craftsmanship. For example, for paintings, whether the perspective makes sense. Or the shading. Or in literature, whether the story in internally consistent (I think the term is verisimilitude). Of course, all rules have exceptions.

Is this a warning or a threat?

They aimed for the mother and hit the baby by accident. The mother was accused of stealing diapers.

Like, this whole thing is fucked up. Nonviolent offenses do not warrant the use of lethal force.

Making it as an artist was always difficult, because the way artists are paid under capitalism favors giving all the money to a few big artists, who ironically aren’t necessarily even that good.

The funny thing about the civil war is that it can be safely ignored. Apart from one point in the main quest, where you need to negotiate a ceasefire, but you can’t possibly fail.

He did make some 💰. The article says the videos sold for hundred of pounds. So it was likely a lucrative hobby.

Another point: Everybody has something to hide from somebody. No matter who you are or what you believe, there’s somebody who wants you dead for it.

Is a video of a baby roasting in an oven even illegal? In general, are videos of violent crime illegal?