

This is kind of an unpopular take among present company, but I believe there is some genuine cause for concern.
I’m gonna sandwich this with a loud declaration that I am not an AI booster, I’m not rube, and I agree that this is used as an excuse for state hacking and for criti-hype. And I do not fall for the diversion in responsibility onto “the AIs”: I hold human beings and companies responsible for the risks and harms.
That said, I encourage people to check out this video by Computerphile, a channel I consider to be run by sensible experts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giTmBaNGaHw
Put basically, these random number generators are genuinely capable of acting in ways that are not easy to predict; they ARE capable of doing things that are dangerous or harmful to people and societies. They pose a risk as a result of bad actors doing harm deliberately as well as careless actors causing unintended harm. And the possibility that the risks these systems pose may be growing at a rate that will lead to catastrophic harms before we recognize the scale of risk is not something I dismiss.
Again, I’m not a booster, I’m not a fan, I don’t believe these systems are self aware or responsible for “their” actions, etc and so forth.





Fwiw, the journalist, Heidi Levine said, “I don’t know how a parent can raise such a monster. They’re not even humans, and yes, they are Jewish terrorists. … And you know what? Sadly, none of them will be prosecuted. I am sure of it.”
The brazenness is shocking, but the bubble of immunity in the press coverage is also cracking.