Made this in response to a meme saying that Tankie and Communist are the same thing.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Authoritarian and hierarchy types don’t have a lot of imagination and are kind of bad at creative exercises for building new ideas. Their creativity is iterative so requires an existing idea. There has only been Soviet style centralized authoritarian communism so that’s all they imagine. Literally unable to imagine any alternative (unless they read political philosophy).

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Building a new idea as opposed to building on an existing idea. The fiction created by pro-authority types leans towards realism.

          • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Authoritarians lack imagination and creativity.

            They usually cannot imagine something completely new, they must “piggyback” off of something that already exists.

            Because there has only really been Authoritarian Communism a la Russia, that’s the only way authoritarians can think of what communism would be, since again, they lack imagination and creativity.

            Seemed pretty clear to me. You link about art but OP not talking about making art. I think you just saw the word “creativity” and thought they meant art or something. They were more so talking about creating systems of governance than creating art.

            • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              I saw the word creativity and assumed they were talking about creativity. Soviet cinema and socialist realism disproves this. If they were truly talking about envisioning different systems of government, they should have said that. Instead, they made a comically huge and hand waving statement about raw creativity from socialist projects.

              Soviets cannot create new ideas

              Then explain the Soviet artistic renaissance

              Oh well I’m only talking about creating new political philosphies

              That’s textbook moving the goalposts.

              • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I am talking about creativity. Soviet era entertainment was based on pre-existing fairy tales and examining the human condition. LOTS of introspection and very little new or innovative that would challenge the status quo.

                Over the same time across the world there were new world of art introducing new ideas and characters that no one had seen before. Comicbooks took the world by storm but were ignored in Soviet controlled areas.

                Soviet art is exactly what I said authoritarian art is: it lacks innovation and new ideas, instead building on what exists. Instead of creating new heroes that resonate across cultures they have deep introspective works examining the human condition. New forms of art come from egalitarian communities. New ways of expressing existing art forms comes from authoritarian communities.

                • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Comic books find their roots in cartoons, satire, and humor books. They didn’t just manifest out of nothing. Do tell me what “original” or “new” ideas were coming out during that era that don’t find their roots in earlier work.

              • Andy@slrpnk.netOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                To be clear: they’re not moving the goalposts, they’re correcting a point of misunderstanding.

                Moving the goalposts is when someone attempts to redefine a claim after the original claim was proven wrong. If you reread it, @ChicoSuave@lemmy.world’s point from the beginning was a critique of modern-day Soviet apologists, not of the citizens, artists, activists, and workers of the Soviet Union.

              • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Again you talk about cinema and plays and art when that’s not what the topic was to begin with. You’re just shadowboxing my comment. Have fun being disingenuous online I guess.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      There are exceptions but generally, no. Only morons would make this mistake since you have to support the tanks to be a tankie.

      • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think you give them too much credit. Try asking them to define it one day. It’s fun!

        Although around election time (when isn’t it election time in their godforsaken country???) americans can’t seem to decide if I am a “tankie” or a russian agent.

  • Andy@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    And don’t accuse me of attacking Tankies. I’m just saying that they don’t own Communism.

    (No one owns Communism: it belongs to all of us, comrade)

    • Forester@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Apparently my instance is not able to accept New Media at this time

      Imagine I posted the gif of willem Dafoe saying fuck em