It’s not your job to find bugs. If you do that’s great, but the author should have done that. It’s your job to ensure the code is well structured, understandable, and follows team norms.
Ask questions if you’re unsure of why something was done the way it was. Sometimes even just asking “why’d you do this” will spark a great design conversation. And if something is confusing it’s worth exploring more clear ways to implement it.
They eat different things than you.
Real “the beatings will continue until morale improves” vibe.
Is the code readable? Does it work? Is it testable? Is it generally in the same style as your other code? Then it’s “fine.”
Hard limits are ridiculous.
Jfc you could write this better to not sound like a dick.
They are misunderstanding distros - I’m just letting them know. No judgement.
there’s always a bunch of people in the comments roasting them for AI use.
That happens here too, it’s just easier when you make AI disclosure a scarlet letter.
No, you’re entirely misunderstanding distros.
In fact pop exists at least in part explicitly to make it easier to install nvidia drivers to support system 76 gaming laptops.
It’s a good option if you want up to date nvidia drivers.
How the hell is this a “self own”?
I have a feeling this is actually a llm benchmarking fan in disguise.
Burn the witch!
Then on top of that, it hallucinates and lies. Chances for bugs or things getting snuck in increase. Since people didn’t write the code, they don’t understand it, so maintainability goes down.
This is called a “self correcting problem”. If it doesn’t work people will correct by either “not using it” or “learning to use it more effectively”.
Do you think everyone is just going to throw their hands up and be like “well the ai done fucked up again, what’re you gonna do?”
Programmers suck. I’ve seen some write some terrible code. You may say “they’re just exceptions” or “they’re just not doing it right”…
If you can’t get a good llm to produce good code then you’re definitely working at it.
Jesus the pearl clutching and over reacting in here is ridiculous.
Exactly what do you think is going to happen that is so horrible?
Still not true. People often just lie or make things up.
It does not matter how much slop was before, we always try to minimize it.
There is no policy that will stop that. It’s happening whether you want it to or not.
What every project needs is a way to handle submissions that ensures a level of quality. The kernel has this. Also needing to police whether code was llm generated would be an increased burden.
There is truth to every bit of propaganda
This is not true.
Well yeah, duh.
Opening ports is also trivial. You don’t generally need a dedicated IP if you keep a connection running but YMMV. And you don’t need a domain - just remember the IP. This is only for a few weeks.
Setting up ssh is nearly trivial. And saying it’s “less secure” doesn’t mean it’s insecure.
It’s the primary access point for thousands of systems and for good reason. It’s “good enough” for your little homelab.
LLMs generate a voluminous amount of code, which is mostly impossible to audit for security anyway.
They can but they didn’t have to. If you tell claude to “minimize changes” or “keep it simple” then it does.
This is why people need to familiarize themselves with AI tools. Even those of you who feel they are “of the devil”. Because how one uses these tools matters.
Jesus… Just port forward 22 to your system and ssh in directly.
Well this study finds: