既要革命，就要有一个革命的党。没有一个革命的党，没有一个按照马克思列宁主义的革命理论和革命风格建立起来的革命党，就不可能领导工人阶级和广大人民群众战胜帝国主义及其走狗。
Fair enough but just sort of definitionally if you’re citing something there is a minimum bar in providing some manner for the person you’re providing the citation too to be able to view the content in question or it’s not really a citation.
Really respectfully, that’s not how citing works. You need to link to the publication/article/book/etc. that you’re actually getting your information from (or at least provide the author(s) and title).
US lead sanctions alone have killed over 30 million people since 1970. Not to mind all their wars like their war of extermination in Korea where they murdered an estimated 1 in 5 to 1 in 4 people of the DPRK, or their war in Vietnam where they carpet bombed and deployed chemical and biological agents against not just Vietnam but surrounding uninvolved countries such as Laos that still have negative effects to this day. Or how about the destruction of Libya under Obama turning the most developed country in Africa into a failed state with open air slave markets. Or the destruction of Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan not only militarily but through the funding of groups such as Isis, Al Qaeda etc.
This is all not even getting into the founding of the US through the genocide of natives or the millions killed by the slave trade etc.
If only that were true. If it was you wouldn’t be a liberal.
Also really tripling down in being a racist piece of shit. Genuinely wishing you the worst.
And straight to dehumanising. Really leaning into not seeing non westerners as humans.
Looking forward to seeing you and your ilk getting what’s coming to you as your empire declines.
Being pro maga is when you accurately point out a promise of treats for Amerikans doesn’t outweigh genocide and imperialism.
Never beating the not seeing people outside of the west as human allegations.
I’m really sorry but it is massively pathetic that you’re a non-Amerikan railing so hard for the democrats. On foreign policy republicans and democrats are so entirely the same that even the most diehard Amerikan libs don’t try to pretend there’s a difference and instead rail on treats at home.
I don’t like being told that I’m a fucking liberal
Have you considered not being one then?
poverty rates plummeted all over the world during the 20th century
If you exclude China from those calculations global poverty by headcount is worse today than 1981 and roughly the same by percentage.
Yeah the difference is that after the years of buildup it’s affecting you now so it’s totally different. It’s not you just didn’t care until it started affecting your life.
The fact that they plainly aren’t? The police were still the police under Dems the same violent gangs brutalising whoever they liked and facing minimal (in reality effectively 0) repercussions. And ice was still ice Dems were more then happy to gloat about record deportations under their administrations, you think ice was suddenly politely asking people if they would like to leave under Dems, obviously not they were the same violent kidnappers putting kids in cages.
This is all not even mentioning the three letter agencies and their bipartisan escapades. (Abu gharib was not an abomination but the system working as intended)
See now you’re backtracking. So they don’t use more covert methods? They use the exact same methods and institutions just “less” (in your mind). But again this is an assertion without merit when you look at how funding for ICE and the militarisation of the police hit record levels under both administrations. So again we’re back to you taking pr and a better controlled news cycle to be a tangible material difference that it simply isn’t.
A dem will opt for more covert methods while the repubs will send the police to outright murder people in the streets and celebrate it.
Again an assertion that doesn’t like up with reality. ICE (the modern Gestapo as many people know them) were no less funded or utilised under dems for example same with the police. They also oversaw and funded genocide. You are falling for the optics and believe just because they say the good things they must not be doing as many of the bad things and it’s just not accurate.
Voting is choosing the quality of the boss fight.
It really isn’t. Did the Dems close Guantanamo? No. Did they defund the Police or ICE? No infact they oversaw record funding. Did they codify roe v wade? No. Did they do anything to slow or stop the foreign child crushing machine? No.
Pr is the only real difference and unfortunately pr is immaterial.
See and once again completely not engaging with the point at hand.
To try get back to the actual matter at hand. You put forth the assertion that voting allows Amerikans to choose who they are fighting. This is blatantly untrue as the democrats and republicans are not the top of the ladder but simply the mask or the orators of those truly at the tops will (the capitalists). In response to this being pointed out you’ve gone on many tangents to use as much leftspeak as you can muster to entirely miss the point and add nothing of value (likely because you cannot as what I pointed out is blatantly obvious to all those with eyes). I am not disparaging you I simply refuse to be pulled down these inane side tangents.
I’m not ignoring anything. I’m accurately characterising a system that not once in its entire existence has challenged the interests of capital. Your response to this has been nonsequitors and leftist vocabulary used as buzzwords you don’t seem to entirely grasp.
No it remains a nonsequitor as pointing out voting in America is a charade over choosing which mask capital wears as opposed to having any material effect on who is in power (the boss which needs fighting) has nothing to do with being detached from the needs of the masses.
I’m not fully integrated into the history etc but I was under the impression that ahh was one of those things taken from aave as opposed to being a form of self censorship.