You can use it to log to a defined file in userspace. You don’t need to “reattach” to the process because all of the output goes through this util. Use signal handling to control the process.

No. https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/logger.1.html

You’re right. A data ase would be absolutely stupid. Use a log shipping library instead.

Also, don’t A/B me.

But what’s in this file?

If you’re just shuffling data around, use a database.

This is a very confusing question. What is the concern about this file, and what do you mean about “reattach”? Is it a long running process? Why would locking thw file, or working in memory of tmp not work? Why is screen not an option?

Threatening or allies again I see?

You pieces of dogshit.

Nice haul! Not many places you can grow Watermelon without critters getting to them before ripeness.

Whoa, neat!

Upright Citizens Brigade is still one of the best sketch shows ever made, along with The Ben Stiller Show. Both of these spawned so much comedy of the last 30 years.

Many, many times. Quite real.

Isn’t Netrunner just KDE for the desktop? I might be missing something.

We might be more helpful I you I clude your rationalizations for these two, and what you’re looking to solve for or gain from these versus others.

I don’t think either has a very large user base.

Not when it’s pointing out another failure by Zuckyboy

Generally no, because most hosting companies would have something baked into SLA/SLO contracts, but all of this shit is done so illegally and shadily now, I wouldn’t put a hard “no” on that possibility.

This is a cry for clicks.

I strongly believe that Fetterman is a plant. He’s 100% not colluding with the Democrats either as opposition, or for any nefarious means as you’re suggesting.

No fucking clue where the other guy got the balls to do this very stupid fucking thing.

They’re both gone soon, regardless.

Well, firstly, it’s not what Tailscale is meant for. I’m getting downvoted by the people using the wrong tool for the wrong job.

You don’t install a VPN on all your local machines just to talk to each other. That’s insane. You especially don’t install one that, while misconfigured, is sending all of its traffic OUTSIDE of your local network, then back in. This is what Tailscale on a number of local machines will do by default.

The way Tailscale works is by installing a Wireguard client on a machine. It then checks in with their DERP servers to figure out it’s network situation (behind NAT, peers in the network, routing tables…etc). So when you have more than one client on the Tailscale network, it automagically assumes some things, the first being that these two machines dont have a more direct route to talk to each other.

So then it will attempt to bridge a path between the DERP server each client is checked into, and pass traffic that way. Which means you then have two machines on the same local network sending traffic OUTSIDE of that network, then back in to complete a VPN network.

This is stupid.

You setup multiple different networks and use exit nodes to bridge two networks together with Tailscale. That’s the entire point. This means setting up routes to let the orchestration layer know that a set of certain machines exist in the same network, and shouldn’t use Tailscale to communicate with each other. Then it will only be using routes for REMOTE networks, where other clients exist, to pass traffic over the Tailscale network.

May I ask what you were planning on doing with Tailscale? I can point you in the right direction.

I hate having to continuously point this out, but DO NOT DO THIS unless you have a deeper understanding of networking.

“Just installing Tailscale” without proper configuration of the default routes is going to cause all kinds of routing inefficiencies and loopbacks in your internal network that is absolutely unnecessary, especially for what OP asking for.

This is just bad advice.

That’s not a meme, that’s Propaganda.

I have no idea what this even means. Examples might be helpful.