I love how you just can’t help yourself but keep replying, Pavlovian indeed. 🤣

That’s right, the color and texture of the boot matters. You shouldn’t let these important decisions be made by someone else.

For sure, there could be lots of solutions here, and we really don’t know much about what’s under the surface either. I just thought it was interesting how much water you need for a million people to live.

quite possibly

It won’t remove them overnight, but they are only able to hold power because of the American backing. If you look at a history of any empire, when the core implodes, so does the periphery.

Being the toxic individual that you are, I doubt even an AI would fuck you.

Thanks, I intend to.

There’s nothing magic about LLMs, but I think we’ve said everything there is to say here, and we’re just going in circles now.

Wow, still going with that are you?

Whatever helps you sleep at night I guess.

Hence, why discussion of whether LLMs were used or not is actively harmful. If you focus on the code and its quality then the whole problem goes away entirely. The person is responsible for the code and what tool they used is irrelevant. Your approach creates a whole new problem that didn’t exist in the first place.

Anybody who’s actually worked with these tools knows that you absolutely can’t just provide wishes for features and end up with anything remotely resembling quality code. And telling whether a human was involved in writing the code or not isn’t hard at all because LLM written code always looks like shit.

The harm in focusing on the tool rather than the code is pretty obvious. Doing so dilutes the responsibility of the developer, since now they can say the LLM introduced a bug or made a bad decision. When the ownership rests with the human, then they are responsible for the code and what it does. How the code was produced is also completely irrelevant, Either the code is clean and it does what it says or not. Nothing else actually matters.

bravo, I’ve never seen somebody pack so much projection into a single comment

Wow, what a well reasoned argument you’ve mustered.

The key difference is that Chinese companies release their models in the open. And nothing is stopping people from building on that using community efforts instead of whinging about AI incessantly. Meanwhile, the data has already been taken, and I don’t believe in copyrights in the first place. There are real arguments to be made against closed proprietary models, but there aren’t really any good arguments against open ones.

it will most certainly go even higher

probably around 150 once the reserves run out

Cherry picking means taking things out of context to misrepresent the state of the facts. I gave a broad overview of many different studies, large and small, which all show the same thing. Let mew know what part of that you’re struggling to understand here.

Also, it’s hilarious that you think I’m secretly upvoting myself here or something like I give a shit about picking up votes on some old thread.

take your own advice maybe