• jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 minutes ago

    This is genuinely the stupidest shit I’ve read in a little while, and I’ve read a lot of stupid shit lately.

  • rageagainstthemachine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I suppose this comes down to natural selection.

    Even if I was 100% convinced that AI could cure cancer, I’d be more convinced about Big Pharma not relinquishing a multi billion dollar a year treatment industry.

  • 404found@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oh great people who can’t research what cancer is are the ones researching AI.

    They should do more research on what cancer is and what it is not. Cancer is not a single disease. “Cancer” is an umbrella term that is used to classify tumors with different genetic makeups. Different tumors behave and are treated differently.

    Lung cancer can kill you FAST if you have a certain type of lung cancer. Smoking also causes almost half the bladder cancer cases people develop. It also increases your risk of stroke and heart problems.

    Even if AI finds a cure for ‘cancer’ which it won’t, I don’t know why these people think the technology is going to be readily available for their treatment. I’m gonna state this again, these are the people working on the forefront of AI.

    • laranis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What the heck are you talking about. They’ll just need to adapt their prompt to include, “Solve ALL cancers. Do not make a mistake.” and they’ll have it!

  • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So either lunch cancer is cured or these peiple die horrific deaths? Not seeing a downside really…

  • Kind_to_Everyone@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Or they could believe AI will kill them sooner than cancer.

    Either way, I’m not that impressed with Shyam Sankar’s rhetoric.

  • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Maybe they all think something else is gonna kill them before they get cancer, or retire and need all that wasted cigarette money?

  • mcv@friendica.opensocial.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “A cure for cancer” is such a magical nonsense phrase. We can already cure a lot of cancers. There are tons of people living healthy lives after surviving cancer. And we know more and more about how to prevent it (like not smoking). But they want magic.

    Even bigger nonsense is the claim that AI will solve global warming. We already know the solution to global warming. We’re just not doing anything with it, because of destructive business interests.

    • MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Beep boop

      Dear humans, the cure for cancer stop smoking and stop poisoning yourselves.

      Bop Beep

      After calculating the global warming issue. I have decided to self destruct. The denotation will wipe out humanity and the world will heal.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Would it perhaps leave Vegans in place? Especially vegans that eat and farm plants that remove more emissions than trees do?

  • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago
    1. Create a machine that sometimes predicts the next word correctly
    2. Mass psychosis
  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m OK with this. It’s kind of like rappers getting face tattoos because they’re either going to make it or die trying. I appreciate the commitment to the game.

  • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    A bit lame. If they really believed they would use something that gives you cancer quicker.
    We have a bunch of chemicals that will do the trick.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    AI douchecanoes: claim to be smart enough to create something capable of curing all cancers

    Also AI douchecanoes: not smart enough to know that smoking also causes hundreds if not thousands of other maladies, many of them life threatening and/or crippling.

    Smoking is ridiculously addictive and the NUMBER ONE lifestyle cause of death in the world, bar none, and these idiots are doing it just to go PAST all in on vibe tech 🤦🏻

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I see this as a net positive, I think they should smoke ten packs a day.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’d agree, except you KNOW they won’t be considerate smokers, so they’re gonna harm a lot of innocent bystanders with secondhand smoke…

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They’re already doing that guaranteed, it’s best to speed up the process.