• f314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      A very good start would be people not having that much power to begin with. Especially not if they’re not democratically elected representatives.

      But for the people in power we’re seemingly talking about (AI company leaders):

      • Not presenting AI as something mystical/mythical
      • Not turning AI into a product tailored to be addictive
      • Not framing AI as a tech only they can be trusted to keep and distribute (see also point 1)
      • Maybe developing the technology towards what gives most utility, not what earns them the most money (fat chance)
      • searabbit@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I just want these AI companies to be held accountable for openly trying to hack everyone. It’s ridiculous they’re allowed to hide behind “AI did it, not us” as if what their product does isn’t their responsibility.

      • locuester@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago
        • Not presenting AI as something mystical/mythical

        this is hard, it’s pretty awesome. How would you want it presented? As a boring tool that does nothing important? Not understanding. The product sells itself to those who see value

        • Not turning AI into a product tailored to be addictive

        Is this something they’re doing?

        • Not framing AI as a tech only they can be trusted to keep and distribute (see also point 1)

        Agreed; open weight models are kicking their ass with this tho. I run local only.

        • Maybe developing the technology towards what gives most utility

        are we not doing that? Why do you need them for this?