It’s not that they cannot be held by a court to be illegal, it’s that it’s not explicit and can be argued away by a good team. This means the expense to try such a case grows and puts pressure on them not to. Trying it and failing also weakens the current law when applied to normies, which they cannot have either. In this case I’m sure the combination of politics and these loopholes mean it wouldn’t be tried.
I know it’s ridiculous, but you first need to define lawyer and attorney as representing ability to legally practice law. Then you can make falsely claiming this to be illegal. Without defining terms meant to define “represent practicing law,” there’s nothing to make illegal.
Just because I’m not an idiot and live under a rock, many people do and would have no idea, and ultimately, there is no such thing. It’s bullshit and not standardized anywhere, just a cultural thing.
You know what I meant, don’t be a pedantic ass. A schoolgirl uniform in this context can be anything. They don’t want skirts, it’s that fucking simple.
Then anything is arbitrarily a uniform as long as more than 1 person is wearing the same thing. Same concept… No such thing as a uniform to ban as per this article.
Depending on features, the moment it’s not single player you will have cheaters. If there’s an economy it will be ruined by this. Orna is another such concept and was ruined by a multitude of factors related to cheating.
Unless it has a specific logo, there is no such thing as a school uniform.
It is still possible to get dried stuck on food not washed off. If items are dirty and very dried, they need an option for longer pre-wash.
Yes this person is just an asocial mean world syndrome asshole.
But now if you do scan you get a brand new no touch Id line that’s even shorter.
To survive ai art, we must get past nudity. We must let go that realistic art represents a reality, and that such a reality is immoral or illegal. It’s not reality, even if loosely based on reality, and fiction should be free from this bullshit.
It is specifically reductionist and true almost always, so I don’t consider that demeaning. Everyone wants to think they are more complex or considering but most innate decisions just aren’t. People just are delusional and not introspective at all.
Men care about a specific silhouette range, and specific disqualifing facial features, and then sometimes horrible personalities, and that is the total sum. Each one of those things is somewhat negotiable if other aspects are superior as well. And the bar lowers depending on the last time they’ve finished, unless it’s been too long, then the bar goes back to baseline. Nobody is that complicated.
But they should have extreme policies. Without them the ratchet effect and legalization of cartel style governing will be permanent. So it should be trivial to point to, just like it’s trivial to point to current regime extreme policy.