Proton is hosting a public map showing more than 300,000 Flock surveillance devices across the United States, preserving access to a research project whose creator faces legal threats and intimidation. The map draws on an inventory obtained by cybersecurity researcher Joshua Michael from Flock’s own systems. According to Proton, it includes more than 170,000 cameras …

  • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    the July bulletin urged officers to watch for suspicious behavior, including unusual questions
    It also listed media attendance […] among potential public safety concerns

    Please stand back quietly as we bring Fascism to your country.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Unlike crowdsourced projects such as DeFlock, Michael’s inventory comes from company records rather than sightings submitted by volunteer

    Huh.

  • ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Love to know what the “legal” part of the threat is. These items are in public locations. You know, why they say there’s no expectation of privacy for us. It works both ways.

    • hash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Per the article this is related to camera locations obtained from flock themselves when they failed to secure things properly. The publicly maintained “deflock” cameras in openstreetmap are on extremely solid legal ground.

  • Toga77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Love this. Hold every company accountable, including proton.

    This is a win now but there’s nothing keeping any company doing good for people, we’ve got to keep them accountable.

    • sensation (she/they)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I made a proton account and quickly became disgusted at how many times the email webclient begged me to link my “GMail” to it. Like, They’d only provide the advertised storage space if I proved that every email to a google account would be automatically forwarded to Proton.

      What if I don’t want to do a deal with the devil just to use your service?

      This is what I remember of my experience around a year ago. I deleted my Proton account within a month. (I <3 Disroot.org)

  • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yeah. Nice and so on. I’d rather have a provider not getting involved with politics, no matter which stance, thanks.

    • moonshadow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      How about a privacy company promoting privacy? Whether or not it’s “political” depends entirely on whether or not you choose to apply that perspective. They’re doing the same thing they’ve always done, and I’m pretty sure the motivation is to maintain their rep/get paid rather than exert influence somehow

      • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Well then fight the core issue: the legislation which allows such cameras. It is okay to fight for privacy so that my service can continue. I am not okay to use my funds to create maps that literally have nothing to do with what proton provides. Fuck that.

        • Guilvareux@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Legislation is not only a legal process. There’s public awareness, democratic mandate. Laws don’t become laws when nobody is interested. Sometimes the people pushing for it are weathly elite, sometimes it’s the little guy.

          Engaging with public initiatives and such, even if it’s slightly performative, to send a message is fighting for the cause.

        • moonshadow@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I mean… It’s not “your” money, they didn’t create the map, and it seems pretty relevant to the rest of their services to me. Would be lit if they put out a privacy respecting navigation app with avoiding em as a feature, I’m about it. Kinda hard to see your take here as genuine, not sure what motivates it

          • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I just want to have a working e-mail service. As soon as a provider gets political, the big trouble including lawsuits start, risking getting bankrupt, making me pay for all of that, with the potential of having no value at the end, as the service has to shut down.

            I absolutely see the need to provide information about the flock cameras. I don’t see the need for Proton to do that.

            • moonshadow@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Gotcha. I first heard about them through their VPN service, see privacy itself as their core product, and email/storage/calendar etc as very logical ways of delivering that same product that navigation or map data in general would be a great addition to. Being a privacy provider in a system so focused on surveillance and manipulation seems pretty “political” in the way you’re using the term no matter what. A proton abstaining from politics in that sense would just be google. Your definition of political seems to be related to how much friction is generated with the establishment, and imo their willingness to provide that friction is exactly what people are paying them for. If all you care about is a working email service, gmail is great. Better even, not to mention free.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Especially since proton is playing both sides at the moment. It comes across as attention seeking.

      • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        At the moment? I believe we all remember what the CEO said when Trump was inaugurated.

        This is just a stupid game and I wish they would invest more time into making their products better.

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Tell me you don’t know that the word politics means without telling me you don’t know that the word politics means.