• nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 days ago

        I call them chatbots or fancy autocomplete. LLM maybe for the better coding agents, but that’s still being generous. Slopbots for the music, website, and image generators.

      • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        I refer to them as G.P. This is a somewhat inside joke for those who were in Ontario and watched Tales of the Riverbank on TVO (aka Hammy Hamster) in the 1960’s and 70’s. Hammy’s friend G.P. was a guinea pig. They’d get up to all sorts of adventures. It wasn’t a cartoon, but filming of real animals in sets with models and with voice dubbing, and a narrator. They obviously put food down where they wanted the animals to go, and I’m pretty sure they glued the paws to steering wheels and the like sometimes. There was also Martha Mouse, who was clearly a white rat. One time the animals … oh, but that’s another story. (That’s how the episodes ended and it was fucking annoying).

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Many AI bros get mad when you say LLM. I wish it was an easier term to say, honestly. It reminds me of the days when everyone would stumble over saying “www”.

          • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            24 days ago

            Never heard this before. AI bros are the first to say “clankers” in my experience. You might just know some weirdos

    • TeaWithDani@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      I was starting to think it should be called SI, but short for Simulated Intelligence. Its a good description of these tools, which look intelligent but are not truely intelligent.

      Then Trump came out with his bullshit.

  • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    24 days ago

    Trump is an absolute moron. No one should listen to anything he says, other than his admissions of crimes committed.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      And most especially of something of a technical matter. And no, his “genes” don’t fucking matter, either, LOL. No one gives a flying fuck who his uncle was.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    Watch, next up the Pedo-in-Chief will state that AI (not calling it the stupid ass term dickless made up) needs to be considered people.

    You know, like how businesses are considered people now. You see where this is going…

  • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    The agreements between OpenAI and Microsoft hinge on “super intelligence” specifically. In exchange for billions in early investment, OAI has to share it’s model tech with MS until ASI is developed.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if all this is just a power play, with OAI bribing trump to get off the hook.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      Probabilistic Automation is probably the best term for a majority of what the orange buffoon calls “super intelligence”.

      I hate that this went from “we want to detect cancer early” to “steal and monetize everything”.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Good stuff

      artificial intelligence → probabilistic automation

      hybrid intelligence → augmented human intelligence

      image recognition → image labeling

      speech recognition → automatic transcription

      the model shows bias → the model reflects bias

      model mistakes → model errors

      chatbots are good at … → chatbots are good for …

      hallucination → undesirable output

      goal → success condition

  • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    Look at it from Trump’s perspective, though. Even a simple markov chain like eliza is super intelligence compared to what’s going on in his brain…

    (No, but seriously, this whole SI thing is really just a scam by his handlers to resell Slovenian domains at an inflated price.)

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    Well, for Trumps level of intelligence, a parrot with a dictionary must look like it’s super intelligent.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Why No One Should Use Trump’s Term

    Because it’s what Trump wants and he made it up on a whim. The fact that people are even entertaining the idea enough to write articles about it is asinine.