• ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Despite the adjustment, the organisation was firm that its longstanding prohibition on whole-blood transfusions has not changed. It anchored the continued ban on its reading of biblical instructions to “abstain from blood,” signalling that the shift applies only to the four major components, not to transfusions in their entirety.

    People died because of this and now they just go “we looked at the rules again and we think they actually mean something else”. What the fuck is this? The Supreme Court?

    • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s stupid. All they had to do was prohibit eating of blood 70 years ago and nobody would have blinked an eye, because that’s exactly what the verse meant in its entirety. The whole blood loophole they’ve done here to save face is meaningless, since whole blood is almost never used except in severe trauma and even then you can use fractions and have a pretty good chance of recovering. A whole lot of people had to die to get here. It sucks.

    • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Correction: this will end about 70 years of people senselessly ending their own lives for their religion. Nobody is being “saved” in this situation.

  • GiveOver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Prayers for those who died of blood loss 2 hours before God pushed the “allow transfusions” hotfix ☹️ 🙏

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    All religions are a form of mental illness. Religion is the greatest threat facing humanity BY FAR.

    Because even after our little temporary oil-powered blip of 8 billion people lobbing planes full of bombs at each other collapses, we’ll still keep inventing gods to disagree over.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The faith people have in capitalism is the same as their faith in their religion. Trump is the leader to his own religion.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        As explained, the economics don’t matter. We seem wired to invent nonsense and hack each other to pieces because of myths.

            • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I’m not even a Christian and this is a genuinely rubbish take, go and look up William Wilberforce for example.

              Edit: I feel that I really have to stress what I thought was obvious, the notion that every human being from behavioural modernity to the Enlightenment was mentally ill is so foolish on the face of it that it isn’t worth even entertaining even for the sake of argument.

              • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yes, they were. I am mentally ill too, I am depressed, I am anxious, we all have some degree of what one generation ago was a mental illness and now isn’t.

                Mental illness doesn’t mean dysfunctional or crazy, but if you have a heart surgeon that’s also a Flat Earther, what do you call that?

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I believe!!! That Satan has a hold of you. I believe! That the Lord God has sent me here! And I believe that in 1978 God changed his mind about black people!!

  • Bryllyg@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    My great aunt was a JW. She lived a fairly long life but it could have been longer. she refused care at the end because of her beliefs. Unreal the control that religions have over people in the guise of morality and an afterlife. So stupid.

    • QueenHawlSera@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Belief in an afterlife is one of the most unfortunate delusions. I would love for it to be true, but the reality is once you die, that’s the end.

  • Furbag@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    So… which higher up at the JW organization needed a life saving transfusion? No way they changed their minds on this unprompted.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why? Shouldn’t they happy to be able to visit God sooner?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Aaahhh, so god visited somebody to give this great news? We love in the times where there are cameras everywhere, so where is the video of this momentous event?

  • Quicky@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    An old JW boss of mine almost lost his wife during the birth of his first child when she was badly haemorrhaging at home.

    I tried asking him about it (a few years after the event) and he was obviously defensive, but the gist was that they wouldn’t have taken a transfusion, and that he would have accepted losing her.

    I’m not convinced - I think the decision was more dictated by her than him - but that would have been the end result.

    Absolute madness

    • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Controlling men like that need to have a life changing surgery of their own before they harm more women like that.

      I prescribe a sharp metal pick and a hammer personally.

      • Quicky@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I think you missed the point of this. I believe it was her influence more than his, based on other factors I’m aware of.

        Unless you’re referring to the writers of the church doctrine as the controlling men.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re really not. Religions are usually based on the idea that an infallible deity or deities created everything.

      If the terms and conditions get updated, that means that the deity/deities are not infallible, and the whole thing kinda falls apart.

      If the religious elders are updating their understanding of the terms and conditions, then they’re not worth listening to and you should just be operating on your own understanding in the first place, which kills the whole idea of organized religion too.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Whenever I see stupid shit like JW refusing blood, i’m reminded of the parable of the man in the flood, who keeps getting rescuers coming to him time and time again, only to refuse it all with the declaration that god would save them… and then they finally die in the flood, and they angerly accost got about why god didnt save him, and god is all like “Fuck you, You fucking idiot. You refused every rescue that came your way. This is your fault for being stupid”

    • boonhet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve seen it in the form of a comic or a short story and God literally said “who do you think sent the rescuers” which if you believe in God is kinda how it’s supposed to work I believe, rather than God straight up lifting you out if the water

  • heliotrope@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Christianity also updates its Ts&Cs on occasion, like in 2007 when Pope John Paul II had a document commisioned, the publication of which was also authorised by Pope Benedict XVI, that basically said unbaptised children now go to heaven instead of limbo.

    • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Mormon church ‘conveniently’ decided to change their rhetoric about non-white people being marked by god because of past sin, right around the time of the Civil Rights Movement.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        They were also firmly disproven by DNA evidence in their claim that native Americans descended from Israelites. Oops.